ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003
Longitudinal reliability of focus glycoprotein G-based type-specific enzyme immunoassays for detection of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in women.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and incidence estimation of HSV-2 by two IgG ELISA methods among South African women at high risk of HIV.PloS one · 2015Article
- Evaluation of three multiplex flow immunoassays compared to an enzyme immunoassay for the detection and differentiation of IgG class antibodies to herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2010Article
- Early childhood infection by human herpesvirus 8 in Zambia and the role of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 coinfection in a highly endemic area.American journal of epidemiology · 2008Article
- The diagnosis of genital herpes - beyond culture: An evidence-based guide for the utilization of polymerase chain reaction and herpes simplex virus type-specific serology.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2007Article
- Diagnostics for herpes simplex virus: is PCR the new gold standard?Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2006Review
- Plasma versus serum for detection of herpes simplex virus type 2-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies with a glycoprotein G2-based enzyme immunoassay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Serologic assays that utilize herpes simplex virus (HSV) type-specific glycoproteins G-1 (HSV-1) and G-2 (HSV-2) to discriminate between antibodies against HSV-1 and HSV-2 are sensitive and specific. However, the high rates of seroreversion, defined as the change in an individual's antibody status from positive to negative over time, previously reported in longitudinal evaluations of glycoprotein G type-specific tests suggests that their use in HSV acquisitional studies would be problematic. To further explore the reliability of the glycoprotein G-based serologic tests, we evaluated HSV-1 and HSV-2 enzyme immunoassays from Focus Technologies in a longitudinal cohort of 1207 young women from Pittsburgh, Pa. On enrollment of the women in the study, HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies were detected in 46.6 and 24.9% of the women, respectively. Among the women with at least three visits, 3.4% (15 of 447) of those who were HSV-1 antibody positive had a subsequent negative result while fewer than 1% (2 of 227) of those who were HSV-2 antibody positive seroreverted. The median of mean positive index values for women who seroreverted to HSV-1 antibody was lower than that for women who remained seropositive (1.25 versus 7.06; P < 0.001). Similarly, the median of mean positive index values for women whose HSV-2 antibody status reverted from positive to negative was lower than that for those women who did not serorevert (1.83 versus 7.46; P = 0.02). Comparative Western blot analysis demonstrated that the lower positive index values, seen more often among the HSV seroreverters, often signified false-positive immunoassay results. Overall, the seroreversion rates were low; the use of glycoprotein G-based serologic tests for the measurement of HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies in incidence studies therefore appears warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.