ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003
Quantitative assay of hepatitis C virus RNA using an automated extraction system for specific capture with probes and paramagnetic particle separation.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extraction of HCV-RNA from Plasma Samples: Development towards Semiautomation.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2015Article
- The role of human metapneumovirus in upper respiratory tract infections in children: a 20-year experience.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A commercially available automated specimen preparation instrument for specific probe capture and paramagnetic separation has been developed (AmpliCap/GT-12; Roche Molecular Systems). We evaluated assay performance of the AmpliCap/GT-12 in the quantitative assay for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA with the AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR Test (version 2.0). Assay linearity using serial dilutions from a serum panel was observed in the range of 500 to 850000 IU/ml, with a slightly compromised slope in the higher viral titers. The overall within-run and between-run reproducibility of the entire detection process for 3 and 5 log(10) (IU/ml) of HCV RNA in samples had a standard deviation of <0.2, which was comparable to a manual method based on organic extraction and isopropanol precipitation (Roche Molecular Systems). Comparison of the test results with those obtained by the manual method showed a good correlation (R(2) = 0.972, n = 86). Using heparin (3, 6.5, and 13 U/ml), dextran sulfate (0.1, 1, and 5 mM), hemoglobin (1.13, 2.25, and 4.5 g/liter), conjugated or unconjugated bilirubin (7.5, 15, and 30 mg/dl), and ATP (1.25, 2.5, and 5.0 mM) as known inhibitors, inhibition was only detected at a dextran sulfate concentration of 1 mM with the manual method but not with the AmpliCap/GT-12 extraction. In summary, the AmpliCap/GT-12 system was shown to permit a stable extraction process and accurate results for the quantitative assay of HCV RNA, successfully eliminating the inhibitory effect of dextran sulfate. This automated extraction system provides reliable and reproducible test results and saves labor; thus, it is suitable for routine diagnostic PCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.