Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12571633›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2003

Enabling topical immunization via microporation: a novel method for pain-free and needle-free delivery of adenovirus-based vaccines.

J Bramson, K Dayball, C Evelegh, Y H Wan, D Page, A Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Nucleic acid delivery into skin for the treatment of skin disease: Proofs-of-concept, potential impact, and remaining challenges.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
  10. Microneedle-mediated transcutaneous immunization with plasmid DNA coated on cationic PLGA nanoparticles.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2012
    Article
  11. Hollow copper sulfide nanoparticle-mediated transdermal drug delivery.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Delivery systems for intradermal vaccination.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2012
    Review
  14. Microsecond thermal ablation of skin for transdermal drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2011
    Article
  15. Enabling skin vaccination using new delivery technologies.Drug delivery and translational research · 2011
    Article
  16. Formulation and coating of microneedles with inactivated influenza virus to improve vaccine stability and immunogenicity.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2010
    Article
  17. Selective removal of stratum corneum by microdermabrasion to increase skin permeability.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2009
    Article
  18. The hairless mouse in skin research.Journal of dermatological science · 2009
    Review
  19. Micro-scale devices for transdermal drug delivery.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2008
    Review
  20. Transdermal drug delivery.Nature biotechnology · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J BramsonDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Center for Gene Therapeutics, McMaster University, Room HSC-4H21B, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada.
K Dayball
C Evelegh
Y H Wan
D Page
A Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin represents an excellent site for vaccine inoculation due to its natural role as a first line of contact with foreign pathogens and the high local frequency of antigen presenting cells. To facilitate skin-directed immunization, a new technique has been developed (termed microporation) whereby a vaporization process is used to remove tiny areas of the stratum corneum creating microscopic pores that allow access to the underlying viable epidermis. Reporter gene expression was 100-fold increased following application of an adenovirus vector to microporated skin when compared to intact skin. Furthermore, 10-100-fold greater cellular and humoral immune responses were observed following topical administration of an adenovirus vaccine to microporated skin versus intact skin. Hairless mice responded to the microporated adenovirus vaccine equivalently to mice with normal hair follicle distribution demonstrating the activity of the microporated vaccine was not related to follicle count. In a tumor challenge model using a surrogate antigen, microporation increased vaccine efficacy by approximately 100-fold compared to intact skin. Finally, microporation enabled delivery of an adenovirus vaccine carrying a relevant melanoma antigen resulting in the development of auto-immune vitiligo and tumor protection. Thus, the microporation technology has proven to be a reliable and easy method to enable skin-directed vaccination.

Indexed as

SkinAdenoviridaeAdministration, CutaneousAnimalsCancer VaccinesElectroporationEpidermisGene ExpressionGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsIntramolecular OxidoreductasesMelanomaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeSkin AbsorptionCancer Vaccinesdopachrome isomeraseIntramolecular Oxidoreductases

Identifiers

PMID12571633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.