ArticleJournal of human hypertension2003
Self-blood-pressure monitoring--a questionnaire study: response, requirement, training, support-group popularity and recommendations.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient self-monitoring of blood pressure and self-titration of medication in primary care: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study of health professionals' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013Trial
- Patient and social environment factors associated with self blood pressure monitoring by male veterans with hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2008Trial
- Factors influencing home blood pressure monitor ownership in a large clinical trial.Journal of human hypertension · 2022Article
- The Association of Health Literacy with High-Quality Home Blood Pressure Monitoring for Hypertensive Patients in Outpatient Settings.International journal of hypertension · 2020Review
- Prevalence and Predictors of Use of Home Sphygmomanometers Among Hypertensive Patients.Cureus · 2017Article
- Improving management and effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative UK primary care study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015Article
- Appraisal of the knowledge of hypertensive patients and assessment of the role of the pharmacists in the management of hypertension: results of a regional survey.Journal of human hypertension · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to survey hypertensive patients' response to, requirement for and training in self-blood pressure monitoring (SBPM). A total of 222 hypertensives were invited to complete a questionnaire even when not participating in the project. Questions supplied information on demographics, monitoring frequency, convenience of attending the surgery, monitor ownership and preference for and ease of self-monitoring. Comments supplied qualitative data. Training group questionnaires supplied similar data as well as SBPM data before and after training. Of 133 respondents, a higher educated, younger, wider age range wanted to participate (76; 57.2%) and tended to self-monitor. However, only an increase in further education (FE) was associated with an increased probability of participation and inclination to self-monitor in the multivariate analyses. A positive relationship exists between age and frequency in both groups. About a sixth of respondents own monitors and ownership is correlated to FE. Although most patients found it convenient to visit the surgery, the percentage finding it convenient was lower in patients attending training sessions than in the original survey, possibly indicating that independence is important for SBPM. Younger, higher-educated patients tended to self-monitor although FE was again the significant factor. Training increased preference for the idea of SBPM, prospective monitor ownership (64.8% of non-owners) and self-monitoring intention (76.1%). Patients found recording card listed cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks valuable and 69.6% (32) wanted to establish a support group. Comments and interviews indicated haphazard knowledge, routines and uncertainty about SBPM. A standardised procedure including patient assessment, SBPM protocol and lifestyle education is needed for SBPM to be successful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12571617What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.