ArticleQuality & safety in health care2003
Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.
Article in Quality & safety in health care, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 404 papers, 39 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
404 citing papers in PubMed, 39 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nutritional Risk Screening Recommendations for Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Research Study and Quality Appraisal of Clinical Guidelines.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating Reporting Completeness in Oral Health Clinical Guidelines: A Meta-Research Study.JDR clinical and translational research · 2026Pooled it
- Hydration Care After Stroke: A Systematic Review of International Clinical Practice Guidelines.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Changes in the diagnosis and management of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents based on recommendations of scientific societies over the last decade.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Methodological Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treatment Evidence-Based Guidelines: A Systematic Review Using the AGREE II and AGREE REX Tools.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Critical appraise of inter-professional clinical practice guidelines for the spiritual care of patients with chronic illness: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury: a systematic review of the methodological quality.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- From guidelines to clinical practice in care for ischaemic stroke patients: A systematic review and expert opinion.European journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Characteristics of Interventional Trials for Patients Living With Intestinal Stoma Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov With a Focus on Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2024Pooled it
- Quality indicators for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Assessment of the Quality of Current American Dental Association Clinical Practice Guidelines.JDR clinical and translational research · 2023Pooled it
- Can you trust clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic surgery.Updates in surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Appraising Evidence-Based Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) Guidelines-PART I: A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality Using AGREE-HS.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Adherence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pharmacologic Treatments of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 to Trustworthy Standards: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Variations in Guidelines for Diagnosis of Child Physical Abuse in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) on the management of female chronic pelvic pain (CPP) using the AGREE II instrument.International urogynecology journal · 2021Pooled it
- Recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination in people with rheumatic disease: Developed by the Singapore Chapter of Rheumatologists.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review of recommendations on screening strategies for breast cancer due to hereditary predisposition: Who, When, and How?Cancer medicine · 2021Pooled it
- International clinical practice guidelines for gender minority/trans people: systematic review and quality assessment.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
344 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternational interest in clinical practice guidelines has never been greater but many published guidelines do not meet the basic quality requirements. There have been renewed calls for validated criteria to assess the quality of guidelines.
objectiveTo develop and validate an international instrument for assessing the quality of the process and reporting of clinical practice guideline development.
methodsThe instrument was developed through a multi-staged process of item generation, selection and scaling, field testing, and refinement procedures. 100 guidelines selected from 11 participating countries were evaluated independently by 194 appraisers with the instrument. Following refinement the instrument was further field tested on three guidelines per country by a new set of 70 appraisers.
resultsThe final version of the instrument contained 23 items grouped into six quality domains with a 4 point Likert scale to score each item (scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity and presentation, applicability, editorial independence). 95% of appraisers found the instrument useful for assessing guidelines. Reliability was acceptable for most domains (Cronbach's alpha 0.64-0.88). Guidelines produced as part of an established guideline programme had significantly higher scores on editorial independence and, after the publication of a national policy, had significantly higher quality scores on rigour of development (p<0.005). Guidelines with technical documentation had higher scores on that domain (p<0.0001).
conclusionsThis is the first time an appraisal instrument for clinical practice guidelines has been developed and tested internationally. The instrument is sensitive to differences in important aspects of guidelines and can be used consistently and easily by a wide range of professionals from different backgrounds. The adoption of common standards should improve the consistency and quality of the reporting of guideline development worldwide and provide a framework to encourage international comparison of clinical practice guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.