Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12571031›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2003

Molecular analyses of Salmonella enterica isolates from fish feed factories and fish feed ingredients.

Live L Nesse, Kerstin Nordby, Even Heir, Bjarne Bergsjoe, Traute Vardund, Halvor Nygaard, Gudmund Holstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Use of Cocktail of Bacteriophage forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Bacteriophage Cocktail Can Effectively ControlFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Photoactivated Carbon Dots for Inactivation of Foodborne PathogensApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Occurrence of Antimicrobial-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Pet Food Factory Isolates ofBioMed research international · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Live L NesseNational Veterinary Institute, N-0033 Oslo, Norway. live.nesse@vetinst.no
Kerstin Nordby
Even Heir
Bjarne Bergsjoe
Traute Vardund
Halvor Nygaard
Gudmund Holstad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolates of the most commonly observed salmonella serovars in Norwegian fish feed factories from 1998 to 2000 (Salmonella enterica serovar Agona, S. enterica serovar Montevideo, S. enterica serovar Senftenberg, and S. enterica serovar Kentucky) were studied by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and plasmid profile analysis and compared to isolates of the same serovars from fish feed ingredients, humans, and other sources (a total of 112 isolates). Within each serovar, a variety of distinct PFGE types (with similarity levels less than 90%) were observed in the feed ingredients and other sources, while only two distinct types of each serovar were identified in the factories. The combined results of PFGE and plasmid analyses showed that each factory harbored only a few S. enterica clones. Some of these clones persisted for at least 3 years in the factories, indicating that there was long-lasting contamination probably due to inadequate decontamination procedures.

Indexed as

FishesFood MicrobiologyIndustryAnimal FeedAnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesCattleElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHumansPlasmidsSalmonella entericaSerotyping

Identifiers

PMID12571031
PMCPMC143582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.