Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12569151›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2003

Huntingtin in health and disease.

Anne B Young

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapy: From Design to the Huntington Disease Clinic.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. mBio · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Noninvasive quantification of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 with [¹¹C]ITDM: a small-animal PET study.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Constitutive upregulation of chaperone-mediated autophagy in Huntington's disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anne B YoungNeurology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. young@helix.mgh.harvard.edu

Funding

METABOTROPIC GLUTAMATE RECEPTORS IN NEURODEGENERATIONR37AG013617 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI YOUNG, ANNE B · 2000 to 2009
$3.7M
RECEPTOR GENE TRANSCRIPTION IN HUNTINGTONS DISEASER01NS038106 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHA, JANG-HO J · 1999 to 2008
$2.9M
METABOTROPIC GLUTAMATE RECEPTORS IN NEURODEGENERATIONR01AG013617 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI YOUNG, ANNE B · 1995 to 1999
–
NIA NIH HHS AG13617NIA NIH HHS R01 AG013617NIA NIH HHS R37 AG013617NINDS NIH HHS NS38106NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesDisease Models, AnimalHumansHuntingtin ProteinHuntington DiseaseMiceMice, TransgenicMutationNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsHTT protein, humanHtt protein, mouseHuntingtin ProteinNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12569151
PMCPMC151871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.