Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12560273›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Controlled trial of effect of documented cardiovascular risk scores on prescribing.

L M L Hall, R T Jung, G P Leese

Abstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. The Fremantle Primary Prevention Study: a multicentre randomised trial of absolute cardiovascular risk reduction.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A nonparametric updating method to correct clinical prediction model drift.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Prognosis research and risk of bias.Internal and emergency medicine · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L M L HallDiabetes Centre, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY.
R T Jung
G P Leese

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesFemaleHumansHypolipidemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Antihypertensive AgentsHypolipidemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID12560273
PMCPMC140760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.