Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003
Controlled trial of effect of documented cardiovascular risk scores on prescribing.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Impact analysis studies of clinical prediction rules relevant to primary care: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Impact of provision of cardiovascular disease risk estimates to healthcare professionals and patients: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2015Pooled it
- Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.BMC health services research · 2008Pooled it
- Systematic review of implementation strategies for risk tables in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.Vascular health and risk management · 2008Pooled it
- Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2006Pooled it
- Framingham-based tools to calculate the global risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review of tools for clinicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2003Pooled it
- Electronic health record-based patient identification and individualized mailed outreach for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: a cluster randomized trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2013 · on this mapTrial
- The Fremantle Primary Prevention Study: a multicentre randomised trial of absolute cardiovascular risk reduction.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012Trial
- Discussing coronary risk with patients to improve blood pressure treatment: secondary results from the CHECK-UP study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2009Trial
- The impact of a decision aid about heart disease prevention on patients' discussions with their doctor and their plans for prevention: a pilot randomized trial.BMC health services research · 2006Trial
- Risk scores of incident mild cognitive impairment in a Beijing community-based older cohort.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Developing a cognitive dysfunction risk score for use with opioid-dependent persons in drug treatment.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2021Article
- A Multimodal Risk Network Predicts Executive Function Trajectories in Non-demented Aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Cognition and the Predictive Utility of Three Risk Scores in an Ethnically Diverse Sample.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2020Article
- A nonparametric updating method to correct clinical prediction model drift.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- Cardiovascular risk assessment and screening in diabetes.Cardiovascular endocrinology · 2017Review
- Prognosis research and risk of bias.Internal and emergency medicine · 2016Article
- Assessment of cardiovascular risk in diabetes: Risk scores and provocative testing.World journal of diabetes · 2015Review
- A summary risk score for the prediction of Alzheimer disease in elderly persons.Archives of neurology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.