Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12556655›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)

Evaluation of angiotensin II receptor blockers for 24-hour blood pressure control: meta-analysis of a clinical database.

Joel Neutel, David H G Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Safety and efficacy of fimasartan in patients with arterial hypertension (Safe-KanArb study): an open-label observational study.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2013
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Industry pulse : editorial development by adis international limited, Italy.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2005
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel NeutelDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Hypertension, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, CA, USA. jmneutel@aol.com
David H G Smith
Long Beach Medical Center · USResearch Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiotensin II receptor blockers are well tolerated and improve compliance in hypertensive patients. The need for 24-hour blood pressure control has focused attention on whether all agents in this class maintain smooth antihypertensive effects over a 24-hour period. Insight into this issue emerged from a meta-analysis of five large, multicenter trials in which ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was used to compare the antihypertensive effects of three angiotensin II receptor blockers: telmisartan, losartan, and valsartan. These trials used either a double-blind, placebo-controlled or a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point design. Initial analysis established the validity of combining ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data from the double-blind, placebo-controlled and prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point designs. Subsequent analyses revealed that telmisartan 80 mg was significantly more effective than losartan 50 mg and valsartan 80 mg for reducing 24-hour mean blood pressure. Furthermore, telmisartan 80 mg was comparable to amlodipine 5 mg for controlling the early morning surge in blood pressure.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBenzimidazolesBenzoatesBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryDouble-Blind MethodHumansHypertensionLosartanMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelmisartanTetrazolesValineValsartanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBenzimidazolesBenzoatesLosartanTelmisartanTetrazolesValineValsartan

Identifiers

PMID12556655
PMCPMC8101823
OpenAlexW2018824917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.