Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12554665›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2003

In vivo evidence for the prokaryotic model of extended codon-anticodon interaction in translation initiation.

Donna Esposito, Julien P Fey, Stephan Eberhard, Amanda J Hicks, David B Stern

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Donna EspositoBoyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research and Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Julien P Fey
Stephan Eberhard
Amanda J Hicks
David B Stern
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initiation codon context is an important determinant of translation initiation rates in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Such sequences include the Shine- Dalgarno ribosome-binding site, as well as other motifs surrounding the initiation codon. One proposed interaction is between the base immediately preceding the initiation codon (-1 position) and the nucleotide 3' to the tRNAf(Met) anticodon, at position 37. Adenine is conserved at position 37, and a uridine at -1 has been shown in vitro to favor initiation. We have tested this model in vivo, by manipulating the chloroplast of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, where the translational machinery is prokaryotic in nature. We show that translational defects imparted by mutations at the petA -1 position can be suppressed by compensatory mutations at position 37 of an ectopically expressed tRNA(fMet). The mutant tRNAs are fully aminoacylated and do not interfere with the translation of other proteins. Although this extended base pairing is not an absolute requirement for initiation, it may convey added specificity to transcripts carrying non-standard initiation codons, and/or preserve translational fidelity under certain stress conditions.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisAlgal ProteinsAnimalsAnticodonBase PairingChlamydomonas reinhardtiiChloroplastsCodonCytochromesCytochromes fMutationNucleic Acid ConformationProtozoan ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, TransferAlgal ProteinsAnticodonCodonCytochromesCytochromes fProtozoan ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID12554665
PMCPMC140755
OpenAlexW2167071852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.