Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12543755›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2003

Trypan blue staining of internal limiting membrane and epiretinal membrane during vitrectomy: visual results and histopathological findings.

K Li, D Wong, P Hiscott, P Stanga, C Groenewald, J McGalliard

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00419185 (Internal Limiting Membrane), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00419185 nacompletednot on this map

Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)- Peeling With Indocyanine Green or Trypan Blue in Macular Hole Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LuebeckRan2003 to 2005Enrolled40ConditionsIdiopathic Macular HoleArmsDelamination of the Internal limiting membrane
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Comparison of macular function and visual fields after membrane blue or infracyanine green staining in vitreoretinal surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2010
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Internal limiting membrane flap technique in macular hole surgery.International journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  7. [Heavy liquids as intraoperative instrument in retinal surgery].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Complications of Macular Peeling.Journal of ophthalmology · 2015
    Review
  17. Chromovitrectomy: an update.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Chromovitrectomy: update.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

K LiSt Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, UK. ken@liteapot.freewire.co.uk
D Wong
P Hiscott
P Stanga
C Groenewald
J McGalliard
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo report on the use of trypan blue (TB) 0.06% for staining the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) during vitrectomy and report on their histology.

method14 consecutive patients with idiopathic macular hole or macular pucker (seven patients each) were prospectively recruited for ILM or ERM peel respectively. After pars plana vitrectomy and induction of posterior vitreous detachment, 0.5 ml TB 0.06% in phosphate buffered saline (VisonBlue) was injected over the posterior pole in an air filled eye and left for 2 minutes. The stained tissue was peeled with intraocular forceps. Specimens were evaluated using histochemical and immunohistochemical methods.

resultsThe average follow up was 4.4 months. Internal limiting membranes and epiretinal membranes were stained satisfactorily in all cases and removed successfully. Eight patients (57%) had improvement of 2 or more Snellen lines. All seven macular holes closed. In the ERM cases, no residual membranes were observed clinically, at the latest follow up. No complications relating to the use of the dye were encountered intraoperatively or postoperatively. Of the 14 procedures, nine (four macular hole and five macular pucker) yielded sufficient tissue for histopathological evaluation. Histological and immunohistological assessment revealed that the morphology of these specimens was similar to that observed in macular hole ILM and macular pucker ERM removed without the aid of dye.

conclusionTB staining facilitated the identification and delineation of ILM and ERM removal during the surgical management of macular holes and macular pucker. The visual outcome of this series and the specimens removed suggest they are no different from those without TB staining. Its use in posterior segment appears to be safe but further studies are required to investigate its long term safety.

Indexed as

Trypan BlueAdultAgedFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMacula LuteaMaleMicroscopy, ElectronMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetinal PerforationsTreatment OutcomeVitrectomyTrypan Blue

Identifiers

PMID12543755
PMCPMC1771493
OpenAlexW2026560684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.