Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12543651›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003

Two mechanisms for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 inhibition by N-terminal modifications of RANTES.

Cristina Pastore, Gastón R Picchio, Francesco Galimi, Richard Fish, Oliver Hartley, Robin E Offord, Donald E Mosier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristina PastoreDepartment of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute. The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Gastón R Picchio
Francesco Galimi
Richard Fish
Oliver Hartley
Robin E Offord
Donald E Mosier
Polyclinic Medical University · CHScripps Research Institute · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

VPA 985 IN LIVER CIRRHOSIS &ASCITESM01RR000833 · NCRR · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BABIOR, BERNARD M · 1985 to 2004
$14.0M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000833NCRR NIH HHS MO1-RR00833NIAID NIH HHS AI43645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the primary coreceptor for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Native chemokines that bind to CCR5 inhibit HIV-1 infection, albeit weakly, but chemically modified chemokines inhibit infection more efficiently. We have investigated the inhibitory mechanism of three N-terminally modified RANTES variants (AOP-, NNY-, and PSC-RANTES) with the MT-2 human T-cell line stably expressing either native or mutated CCR5. The RANTES analogues showed the same rank order (PSC > NNY > AOP) in their capacity to induce prolonged CCR5 internalization, inhibit surface reexpression, and prevent HIV-1 infection on MT-2 cells expressing wild-type CCR5 or CCR5 with four C-terminal serine phosphorylation sites mutated to alanine. None of the RANTES analogues caused internalization of a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain deletion mutant of CCR5, and each derivative had equal potency in inhibiting HIV-1 infection of MT-2 cells expressing this mutant. We conclude that the C-terminal cytoplasmic residues of CCR5 are necessary for receptor sequestration by RANTES analogues but that the process and the relative activity of each derivative are not dependent upon phosphorylation of the C-terminal serine residues. Two mechanisms of antiviral activity are demonstrated: receptor blockade and receptor sequestration. Potency correlates with the ability to induce CCR5 sequestration but not with receptor binding, suggesting that sequestration may make the greater contribution to antiviral activity.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsChemokine CCL5HeLa CellsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansReceptors, CCR5Virus ReplicationAnti-HIV AgentsChemokine CCL5Receptors, CCR5

Identifiers

PMID12543651
PMCPMC151767
OpenAlexW1992758988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.