ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2003
Animal models of allergic asthma.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AllerBase: a comprehensive allergen knowledgebase.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
- Soft-X-ray-enhanced electrostatic precipitation for protection against inhalable allergens, ultrafine particles, and microbial infections.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- A review of antisense therapeutic interventions for molecular biological targets in asthma.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2007Article
- Influence of the route of sensitization on local and systemic immune responses in a murine model of type I allergy.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2004Article
- Antisense- and RNA interference-based therapeutic strategies in allergy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We are fortunate to have many species of animals that can serve as adequate models for allergic disease in humans. This review is focused mostly on models of allergic airway disease, and some major categories of animals used for asthma research are discussed, including rodents and nonhuman primates. Furthermore, evidence that supports and criticizes the use of animal models of asthma is provided. There is no animal model that exactly reproduces the pathology of human asthma. However, these models are necessary for the development of novel therapies and an understanding of the detailed pathogenesis of the response of mammals to respirable allergens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12542998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.