ReviewGenome biology2002
Apollo: a sequence annotation editor.
Review in Genome biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 322 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
322 citing papers in PubMed.
- TheGenes · 2026Article
- Bipartite mitogenome of Fargesia angustissima reveals repeat-mediated structural dynamics, inter-organellar DNA transfers, and phylogenetic discordance.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Rubus chingii chloroplast genome sequences: a comparative analysis with other Rubus L.chloroplast genomes.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Assembly and Comparative Analysis of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Organization and comparative analysis of the multi-chromosomal mitochondrial genome in Tagetes erecta (Asteraceae).BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of multi-chromosomal mitochondrial genome of Bletilla striata: homologous recombination mediated by repetitive sequences.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Assembly and Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The Mitochondrial Genome ofGenes · 2026Article
- Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of two species of Argentina (Rosaceae).BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Structural characterization of the plastid genome and comparative mitochondrial genomics of Eupatorium lindleyanum (Asteraceae): evolutionary dynamics and phylogenetic insights.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of theBiology · 2026Article
- Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of the Maclura tricuspidata.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Complete chloroplast genome characterization and phylogenetic analysis of two natural caffeine-freeFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Structure and multipartite genome architecture of the mitochondrial genome in the endangered medicinal plantFrontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
- Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete multichromosomal mitochondrial genome of an endangered orchid species,Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- The complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
262 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The well-established inaccuracy of purely computational methods for annotating genome sequences necessitates an interactive tool to allow biological experts to refine these approximations by viewing and independently evaluating the data supporting each annotation. Apollo was developed to meet this need, enabling curators to inspect genome annotations closely and edit them. FlyBase biologists successfully used Apollo to annotate the Drosophila melanogaster genome and it is increasingly being used as a starting point for the development of customized annotation editing tools for other genome projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.