ArticleGenome biology2002
A Drosophila full-length cDNA resource.
Article in Genome biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.
- Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review.Genome biology · 2002Pooled it
- Article
- A distinct isoform of Msp300 (nesprin) organizes the perinuclear microtubule-organizing center in adipocytes.Molecular biology of the cell · 2025Article
- Drosophila Trus, the orthologue of mammalian PDCD2L, is required for proper cell proliferation, larval developmental timing, and oogenesis.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Phospholipid scramblase 1: an essential component of the nephrocyte slit diaphragm.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Fourth Chromosome Resource Project: a comprehensive resource for genetic analysis in Drosophila that includes humanized stocks.Genetics · 2024Article
- Molecular and functional characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster conserved smORFome.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Next-generation large-scale binary protein interaction network for Drosophila melanogaster.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Two neuronal peptides encoded from a single transcript regulate mitochondrial complex III ineLife · 2022Article
- Characterization ofCells · 2022Article
- Comprehensive History ofGenes · 2020Review
- Significance of DopEcR, a G-protein coupled dopamine/ecdysteroid receptor, in physiological and behavioral response to stressors.Journal of neurogenetics · 2020Review
- The fruit fly at the interface of diagnosis and pathogenic mechanisms of rare and common human diseases.Human molecular genetics · 2019Article
- Accurate genome-wide predictions of spatio-temporal gene expression during embryonic development.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Evidence for the temporal regulation of insect segmentation by a conserved sequence of transcription factors.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018Article
- Article
- Review
- Lef1-dependent hypothalamic neurogenesis inhibits anxiety.PLoS biology · 2017Article
- A new promoter element associated with daily time keeping in Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA collection of sequenced full-length cDNAs is an important resource both for functional genomics studies and for the determination of the intron-exon structure of genes. Providing this resource to the Drosophila melanogaster research community has been a long-term goal of the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project. We have previously described the Drosophila Gene Collection (DGC), a set of putative full-length cDNAs that was produced by generating and analyzing over 250,000 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) derived from a variety of tissues and developmental stages.
resultsWe have generated high-quality full-insert sequence for 8,921 clones in the DGC. We compared the sequence of these clones to the annotated Release 3 genomic sequence, and identified more than 5,300 cDNAs that contain a complete and accurate protein-coding sequence. This corresponds to at least one splice form for 40% of the predicted D. melanogaster genes. We also identified potential new cases of RNA editing.
conclusionsWe show that comparison of cDNA sequences to a high-quality annotated genomic sequence is an effective approach to identifying and eliminating defective clones from a cDNA collection and ensure its utility for experimentation. Clones were eliminated either because they carry single nucleotide discrepancies, which most probably result from reverse transcriptase errors, or because they are truncated and contain only part of the protein-coding sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.