Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12535511›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Options for self-management education for adults with asthma.

H Powell, P G Gibson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 19 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Delivery of supported self-management in remote asthma reviews: A systematic rapid realist review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Written action plans for children with long-term conditions: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative data.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Chronic disease management programmes for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Digital asthma self-management interventions: a systematic review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2014
    Pooled it
  13. Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  14. Psychosocial factors and behavioral medicine interventions in asthma.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2013
    Pooled it
  15. Primary care based clinics for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Guideline
  19. Guideline
  20. Trial

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H PowellDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Hunter Mail Centre, NSW, Australia.
P G Gibson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma education and self-management are key recommendations of asthma management guidelines because they improve health outcomes. There are several different modalities for the delivery of asthma self-management education.

objectivesWe evaluated programmes that: 1) Optimised asthma control through inhaled corticosteroid use by regular medical review or optimised asthma control by individualised written action plans 2) Used written self-management plans based on peak expiratory flow self-monitoring compared with symptom self-monitoring 3) Compared different options for the delivery of optimal self-management programmes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of asthma self-management education interventions in adults over 16 years of age with asthma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Fifteen trials met the inclusion criteria. Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for confirmation. MAIN

results1) Six studies compared optimal self-management allowing self-adjustment of medications according to an individualised written action plan to adjustment of medications by a doctor. These two styles of asthma management gave equivalent effects for hospitalisation, ER visits, unscheduled doctor visits and nocturnal asthma. 2) Self-management using a written action plan based on PEF was found to be equivalent to self-management using a symptoms based written action plan in the six studies which compared these interventions. 3) Three studies compared self-management options. In one, that provided optimal therapy but tested the omission of regular review, the latter was associated with more health centre visits and sickness days. In another, comparing high and low intensity education, the latter was associated with more unscheduled doctor visits. In a third, no difference in health care utilisation or lung function was reported between verbal instruction and written action plans. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsOptimal self-management allowing for optimisation of asthma control by adjustment of medications may be conducted by either self-adjustment with the aid of a written action plan or by regular medical review. Individualised written action plans based on peak expiratory flow are equivalent to action plans based on symptoms. Reducing the intensity of self-management education or level of clinical review may reduce its effectiveness.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicAdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaHumansPeak Expiratory Flow RateSelf CareAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID12535511
PMCPMC8406716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.