Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12535509›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for treatment of respiratory failure due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

F S Ram, J V Lightowler, J A Wedzicha

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. How should we monitor patients with acute respiratory failure treated with noninvasive ventilation?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Variability in Nose-to-Lung Aerosol Delivery.Journal of aerosol science · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Brazilian recommendations of mechanical ventilation 2013. Part I.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F S RamDepartment of Physiological Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School, Level 0, Jenner Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK, SW17 0RE. fram@sghms.ac.uk
J V Lightowler
J A Wedzicha
St George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is being used increasingly in the management of patients admitted to hospital with acute respiratory failure secondary to an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of NPPV in the management of patients with respiratory failure due to an acute exacerbation of COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: An initial search was performed using the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and other relevant electronic databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing NPPV plus usual medical care versus usual medical care alone were selected. Trials needed to recruit adult patients admitted to hospital with respiratory failure due to an exacerbation of COPD and with PaCO2 > 6 kPa (45 mmHg). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected articles for inclusion, evaluated methodological quality of the studies and abstracted the data. MAIN

resultsEight studies were included in the review. NPPV resulted in decreased mortality (Relative Risk [RR] 0.41; 95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 0.26, 0.64), decreased need for intubation (RR 0.42; 95%CI 0.31, 0.59), reduction in treatment failure (RR 0.51; 95%CI 0.39, 0.67), rapid improvement within the first hour in pH (Weight Mean Difference [WMD] 0.03; 95%CI 0.02, 0.04), PaCO2 (WMD -0.40 kPa; 95%CI -0.78, -0.03) and respiratory rate (WMD -3.08 bpm; 95%CI -4.26, -1.89). In addition, complications associated with treatment (RR 0.32; 95%CI 0.18, 0.56) and length of hospital stay (WMD -3.24 days; 95%CI -4.42, -2.06) were also reduced in the NPPV group. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsData from good quality randomised controlled trials permit NPPV to be recommended as the first line intervention, coupled with usual medical care, in all suitable patients with respiratory failure secondary to an acute exacerbation of COPD. A trial of NPPV should be considered early in the course of respiratory failure, and before severe acidosis ensures, as a means of avoiding endotracheal intubation, reducing mortality and treatment failure.

Indexed as

AdultHumansPositive-Pressure RespirationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID12535509
OpenAlexW4240397250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.