Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12535505›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders.

M Marshall, R Crowther, A Almaraz-Serrano, F Creed, W Sledge, H Kluiter, C Roberts, E Hill, D Wiersma

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  2. Systematic review of specialist palliative day-care for adults with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2005
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Acute day hospital as a cost-effective alternative to inpatient therapy].Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mental health system in Saudi Arabia: an overview.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2013
    Article
  11. How close is evidence to truth in evidence-based treatment of mental disorders?European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  12. Lessons learned in developing community mental health care in Europe.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Evidence-based medicine in psychopharmacotherapy: possibilities, problems and limitations.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Acute psychiatric day hospitals.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

M MarshallDepartment of Community Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Academic Unit, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Fulwood, Preston., Lancashire, UK, PR2 4HT. mmarshall@man.ac.uk
R Crowther
A Almaraz-Serrano
F Creed
W Sledge
H Kluiter
C Roberts
E Hill
D Wiersma
Royal Preston Hospital · GBUniversity of Groningen · NLSalford Royal Hospital · GBThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Manchester · GBYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInpatient treatment is an expensive way of caring for people with acute psychiatric disorders. It has been proposed that many of those currently treated as inpatients could be cared for in acute psychiatric day hospitals.

objectivesTo assess the effects of day hospital versus inpatient care for people with acute psychiatric disorders. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2000), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2000), EMBASE (1980 to December 2000), CINAHL (1982 to December 2000), PsycLIT (1966 to December 2000), and the reference lists of articles. We approached trialists to identify unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of day hospital versus inpatient care, for people with acute psychiatric disorders. Studies were ineligible if a majority of participants were under 18 or over 65, or had a primary diagnosis of substance abuse or organic brain disorder. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and cross-checked. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous data. Weighted or standardised means were calculated for continuous data. Day hospital trials tend to present similar outcomes in slightly different formats, making it difficult to synthesise data. Individual patient data were therefore sought so that outcomes could be reanalysed in a common format. MAIN

resultsNine trials (involving 1568 people) met the inclusion criteria. Individual patient data were obtained for four trials (involving 594 people). Combined data suggested that, at the most pessimistic estimate, day hospital treatment was feasible for 23% (n=2268, CI 21 to 25) of those currently admitted to inpatient care. Individual patient data from three trials showed no difference in number of days in hospital between day hospital patients and controls (n=465, 3 RCTs, WMD -0.38 days/month CI -1.32 to 0.55). However, compared to controls, people randomised to day hospital care spent significantly more days in day hospital care (n=265, 3 RCTs, WMD 2.34 days/month CI 1.97 to 2.70) and significantly fewer days in inpatient care (n=265, 3 RCTs, WMD -2.75 days/month CI -3.63 to -1.87). There was no significant difference in readmission rates between day hospital patients and controls (n=667, 5 RCTs, RR 0.91 CI 0.72 to 1.15). For patients judged suitable for day hospital care, individual patient data from three trials showed a significant time-treatment interaction, indicating a more rapid improvement in mental state (n=407, Chi-squared 9.66, p=0.002), but not social functioning (n=295, Chi-squared 0.006, p=0.941) amongst patients treated in the day hospital. Four of five trials found that day hospital care was cheaper than inpatient care (with cost reductions ranging from 20.9 to 36.9%). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsCaring for people in acute day hospitals can achieve substantial reductions in the numbers of people needing inpatient care, whilst improving patient outcome.

Indexed as

Day Care, MedicalHospitalizationAcute DiseaseHumansLength of StayMental DisordersPsychotic DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID12535505
OpenAlexW2619468491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.