Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12535444›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home.

Outpatient Service Trialists

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Defining and measuring patient-centred care: an example from a mixed-methods systematic review of the stroke literature.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Community neurorehabilitation: a synthesis of current evidence and future research directions.NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2006
    Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Taking Charge after Stroke: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2020
    Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Outpatient Service Trialists

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke Unit care is now accepted as an effective service model for hospital care, but the effectiveness of outpatient care is less certain. This review focuses on therapy-based rehabilitation services targeted at stroke patients living at home.

objectivesTo assess the effects of therapy-based rehabilitation services targeted towards stroke patient resident in the community within one year of stroke onset/ discharge from hospital following stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched November 2001). In addition we searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1996 - Nov 2001), EMBASE (1980 - Nov 2001), CINAHL (1983 - Nov 2001), PsycINFO (1967 - Nov 2001), AMED (1985 - Nov 2001), Wilson Social Sciences Abstracts (1984-Nov 2001), Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index (1981-Nov 2001). Other strategies to ensure identification of all potentially relevant trials included scanning reference lists of relevant articles and original papers, personal communication and hand searching journals. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, truly randomised controlled trials of stroke patients resident in the community receiving a therapy service intervention, which was compared to conventional or no care. Therapy services were those provided by physiotherapy, occupational therapy, or multidisciplinary staff working with patients primarily to improve task-orientated behaviour (e.g. walking, dressing) and hence increase activity and participation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials and extracted data on a number of prespecified outcomes. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients who had deteriorated or were dependent in personal activities of daily living and performance in personal activities of daily living at the end of follow-up. MAIN

resultsWe identified a heterogeneous group of 14 trials including 1617 patients. Therapy-based rehabilitation services reduced the odds of a poor outcome (Peto odds ratio 0.72 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.92; P = 0.009) and increased personal activity of daily living scores (standardised mean difference 0.14 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.25; P = 0.02). For every 100 stroke patients resident in the community receiving therapy-based rehabilitation services, 7 (95% CI 2 to 11) patients would be spared a poor outcome, assuming 37.5% would have had a poor outcome with no treatment. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsTherapy-based rehabilitation services targeted towards stroke patients living at home appear to improve independence in personal activities of daily living. However, the evidence is derived from a review of heterogeneous interventions and therefore further exploration of the interventions is justifiable.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingHome Care ServicesHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID12535444
PMCPMC6464951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.