SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Exploring changes over time and characteristics associated with data retrieval across individual participant data meta-analyses: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2017Pooled it
- Carbamazepine versus phenobarbitone monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Epilepsy (generalised).BMJ clinical evidence · 2012Pooled it
- Epilepsy (partial).BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- Epilepsy (generalised).BMJ clinical evidence · 2010Pooled it
- Long-term phenobarbital treatment is effective in working-age patients with epilepsy in rural Northeast China: a 10-year follow-up study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Review
- Scaling-up essential neuropsychiatric services in Ethiopia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Health policy and planning · 2016Article
- Antiepileptic Drug Treatment in Children with Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2015Review
- Medication side effects among people with epilepsy taking phenobarbital in Zambia.Epilepsy research · 2014Article
- Sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: an opinion survey regarding the establishment of a central repository.PloS one · 2014Article
- Treatment options for refractory and difficult to treat seizures: focus on vigabatrin.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2011Article
- Packages of care for epilepsy in low- and middle-income countries.PLoS medicine · 2009Article
- Article
- Article
- Revisiting phenobarbital for epilepsy.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn developing countries, phenobarbitone is commonly used but its use in Europe and the USA has decreased due to concerns over adverse effects. Carbamazepine is recommended as the drug of choice for partial onset seizures, and there is concern that it may worsen some generalized onset seizure types. We report a review using individual patient data in which carbamazepine and phenobarbitone are compared.
objectivesTo review the effects of carbamazepine compared to phenobarbitone monotherapy for people with partial onset seizures or generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Controlled trials register (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002); MEDLINE; EMBASE; handsearching; contacting experts and original trial investigators; contacting manufacturers of carbamazepine. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized, blinded or unblinded controlled trials in children or adults with partial onset seizures or generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Outcome measures were (i) time to withdrawal of allocated treatment, (ii) time to 12 month remission, and (iii) time to first seizure. Data were analysed using a stratified logrank analysis with results expressed as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), where a HR>1 indicates an event is more likely on phenobarbitone. A test for interaction between treatment and seizure type (partial versus generalized onset) was also undertaken. MAIN
resultsData are available for 684 participants from four trials, representing 59% of the participants recruited into the nine trials that met our inclusion criteria. The main overall results (HR 95% CI) adjusted for seizure type were, (i) time to withdrawal 1.63(1.23 to 2.15), (ii) time to 12 month remission 0.87(0.65 to 1.17), (iii) time to first seizure 0.85(0.68 to 1.05). The review suggests that time to withdrawal is significantly improved with carbamazepine compared to phenobarbitone. No overall difference between drugs is identified for the outcomes 'time to 12 month remission' and 'time to first seizure'. Statistical heterogeneity was not encountered. An interaction between treatment and seizure type, confirmed statistically, was identified for time to first seizure, where phenobarbitone was favoured for partial onset seizures and carbamazepine for generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsWe found no overall difference between carbamazepine and phenobarbitone for time to 12 month remission or time to first seizure, however, subgroup analyses for time to first seizure suggest an advantage with phenobarbitone for partial onset seizures and a clinical advantage with carbamazepine for generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures. Phenobarbitone is significantly more likely to be withdrawn, indicating that it is less well tolerated than carbamazepine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.