Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12535411›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Mobilisation strategies after hip fracture surgery in adults.

H H Handoll, M J Parker, C Sherrington

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Exercise prescription after fragility fracture in older adults: a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H H HandollNHMRC Injury Partnership Program, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia, NSW 2031. c.sherrington@unsw.edu.au
M J Parker
C Sherrington

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-operative care programmes after hip fracture surgery include strategies for mobilisation, such as early weight bearing, gait retraining and other physical therapy interventions.

objectivesTo evaluate the effects of different mobilisation strategies and programmes after hip fracture surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register (to August 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to August week 5 2002), the National Research Register (Issue 2, 2002), Current Controlled Trials, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing different mobilisation strategies/programmes after hip fracture surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewers independently assessed trial quality, using a 10 item scale, and extracted data. Wherever appropriate and possible, the data are presented graphically. MAIN

resultsOur second update included one new study. Only two of the six included trials involved a similar comparison. All trials had methodological limitations, including inadequate follow-up. Two trials, involving a total of 188 patients, compared a more intensive with a less intensive regimen of physiotherapy. One reported a lack of demonstrable difference in recovery of the two patient groups at nine weeks follow-up. The other found a higher level of drop-out in the more intensive group with no difference in length of hospital stay. Only limited outcome data were available for both trials. One trial of 80 patients evaluated a quadriceps muscle strengthening exercise programme. Improved mobility, leg extension power and Barthel score were reported for the intervention group. A treadmill gait retraining programme was compared with a conventional gait retraining programme in 40 patients. More patients in the treadmill group had recovered their pre-fracture level of mobility by the time of hospital discharge, which tended to happen earlier than for the control group. Neither of these differences were statistically significant. One trial of 27 patients compared neuromuscular stimulation of the quadriceps muscle with placebo stimulation. More patients in the stimulation group had recovered their pre-fracture mobility at 13 weeks follow-up. One trial involving 273 patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture treated by internal fixation compared weight bearing at two weeks after surgery with delayed weight bearing at 12 weeks after surgery. From the limited data available, there were no statistically significant differences between the two methods of treatment for non-union, mortality and overall unfavourable outcome at one year. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to determine the effects of more frequent or a more intensive programme of physiotherapy, quadriceps strengthening exercises, treadmill gait retraining, or neuromuscular stimulation after hip fracture surgery. There is also insufficient evidence to determine the effects of early weight bearing after the internal fixation of an intracapsular proximal femoral fracture.

Indexed as

MovementAdultGaitHip FracturesHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesProgram EvaluationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.