Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12534646›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2003

Pharmacokinetic interaction between amprenavir and delavirdine after multiple-dose administration in healthy volunteers.

Ulrik S Justesen, Niels A Klitgaard, Kim Brosen, Court Pedersen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ulrik S JustesenInstitute of Public Health, Clinical Pharmacology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. ujustesen@health.sdu.dk
Niels A Klitgaard
Kim Brosen
Court Pedersen
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the safety and the pharmacokinetic interaction between amprenavir and delavirdine after multiple dose administration in healthy volunteers.

methodsThis was a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, two-sequence, two-period multiple dose study with 18 healthy subjects. Volunteers were randomly assigned to amprenavir, 600 mg twice a day, or delavirdine, 600 mg twice a day, for 10 days, followed by both drugs for another 10 days with pharmacokinetic evaluation on day 10 and day 20. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study.

resultsAmprenavir decreased all the delavirdine pharmacokinetic parameters apart from tmax. Delavirdine C12h dropped from 7,916 to 933 ng ml-1 (median decrease 5,930 ng ml-1, 95% CI 3,013, 8,955 ng ml-1). A decrease in amprenavir t(1/2) was also seen leading to almost identical median amprenavir C24h values. No serious clinical adverse events were observed during the study. The most frequently reported effects were gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, fatigue and rash.

conclusionsAmprenavir is an effective inducer of delavirdine metabolism, probably through its effect on hepatic CYP3A4. This could have consequences in other drug-drug interaction situations. Delavirdine is an inhibitor of amprenavir metabolism. The regimen of amprenavir 600 mg and delavirdine 600 mg twice a day is not recommended when an antiretroviral effect from delavirdine is required.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsCarbamatesDelavirdineDrug InteractionsFuransHumansMaleProspective StudiesSulfonamidesamprenavirAnti-HIV AgentsCarbamatesDelavirdineFuransSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID12534646
PMCPMC1884187
OpenAlexW1517238446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.