ReviewDrug safety2003
Tolerability of the triptans: clinical implications.
Review in Drug safety, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence-based review and frontiers of migraine therapy.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Review
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Review
- A Framework for Estimating the Eligible Patient Population for New Migraine Acute Therapies in the United States.Advances in therapy · 2021Review
- Ischemic Colitis as a Complication of Medication Use: An Analysis of the Federal Adverse Event Reporting System.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2016Article
- Triptan safety during pregnancy: a Norwegian population registry study.European journal of epidemiology · 2013Article
- Subcutaneous delivery of sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine and primary headache.Patient preference and adherence · 2012Article
- Triptans in pregnancy.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2008Review
- Temporary confusion depending on the usage of naratriptan.The journal of headache and pain · 2007Article
- Use of the sustained pain-free plus no adverse events endpoint in clinical trials of triptans in acute migraine.CNS drugs · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The triptans represent a relatively new class of compounds effective in the treatment of migraine. The safety and tolerability of these drugs have been extensively investigated since the first triptan (sumatriptan) became commercially available. A report on a very large population of patients tested during clinical trials and in postmarketing studies, confirms that these drugs are safe and well tolerated when correctly used. Adverse events are frequently reported, but are usually mild and only a few patients discontinue therapy because of them. These adverse events include, in particular, the so-called 'triptan symptoms' (tingling, sensation of warmth, etc.). The exact mechanism of chest symptoms reported by 20% of patients with migraine treated with triptans remains unclear, but are exceptionally related to a cardiac mechanism. CNS adverse events (i.e. somnolence) are also reported, but it is a matter of debate whether they are related to the pharmacological properties (i.e. lipophilicity) of the drug or are symptoms of the disease itself. The potential risk for drug overuse must be taken into account when the triptans are given to patients with a high frequency of migraine attacks. Clinical interaction of triptans with other drugs metabolised in the liver may theoretically influence the incidence of adverse events, but there is little evidence to support this assumption. There is no evidence of a teratogenic risk of triptans in pregnant women taking these drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.