Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12533274›Full record

ReviewEmerging infectious diseases2003

Maintaining fluoroquinolone class efficacy: review of influencing factors.

W Michael Scheld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging infectious diseases, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2003
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Fluoroquinolone-Mediated Tendinopathy and Tendon Rupture.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Genes · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Antibacterial Prodrugs to Overcome Bacterial Resistance.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

W Michael ScheldUniversity of Virginia, School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA. wms@Virginia.EDU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous experience with antimicrobial resistance has emphasized the importance of appropriate stewardship of these pharmacotherapeutic agents. The introduction of fluoroquinolones provided potent new drugs directed primarily against gram-negative pathogens, while the newer members of this class demonstrate more activity against gram-positive species, including Streptococcus pneumoniae. Although these agents are clinically effective against a broad range of infectious agents, emergence of resistance and associated clinical failures have prompted reexamination of their use. Appropriate use revolves around two key objectives: 1) only prescribing antimicrobial therapy when it is beneficial and 2) using the agents with optimal activity against the expected pathogens. Pharmacodynamic principles and properties can be applied to achieve the latter objective when prescribing agents belonging to the fluoroquinolone class. A focused approach emphasizing "correct-spectrum" coverage may reduce development of antimicrobial resistance and maintain class efficacy.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial InfectionsFluoroquinolonesGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAnti-Infective AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID12533274
PMCPMC2873754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.