Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12530932›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2003

Homocysteine and blood pressure.

Coen van Guldener, Prabath W B Nanayakkara, Coen D A Stehouwer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Coen van GuldenerVrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.vanguldener@vumc.nl
Prabath W B Nanayakkara
Coen D A Stehouwer
General Department of Preventive Medicine · VNVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies, some population-based, have linked plasma homocysteine levels to blood pressure, especially systolic pressure. The strength of this association is weak, but may be underestimated due to inaccurate blood pressure measurements. In addition, the association may be confounded by renal function. Observations that homocysteine-lowering therapies with folic acid-based treatments have been followed by decreases in blood pressure, however, raise the possibility that the link between homocysteine and blood pressure is real, which is important as homocysteine levels can easily be lowered by folic acid-based regimens. Mechanisms that could explain the relationship between homocysteine and blood pressure include increased arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction with decreased availability of nitric oxide, low folate status, and insulin resistance. So far, however, no evidence has been provided that these mechanisms are operative in humans. Ongoing large intervention studies with homocysteine-lowering vitamins may indicate whether blood pressure is indeed lowered by these vitamins, whether the blood pressure decrease, if any, is explained by the decrease in homocysteine levels, and whether a vitamin treatment-associated decrease in cardiovascular morbidity (if any) is explained by the decrease in blood pressure.

Indexed as

AnimalsArteriesBlood PressureEndothelium, VascularHomocysteineHumansHyperhomocysteinemiaHypertensionInsulin ResistanceKidneyHomocysteine

Identifiers

PMID12530932
OpenAlexW2014793094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.