ArticleJournal of virology2003
Replication of human immunodeficiency viruses engineered with heterologous Tat-transactivation response element interactions.
Article in Journal of virology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Modeling of Subtype-Specific Tat Protein Signatures to Predict Tat-TAR Interactions That May Be Involved in HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Protein post-translational modifications:Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2017Review
- Tat acetylation modulates assembly of a viral-host RNA-protein transcription complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009Article
- Computational identification of protein methylation sites through bi-profile Bayes feature extraction.PloS one · 2009Article
- Targeting tat inhibitors in the assembly of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription complexes.Journal of virology · 2008Article
- Arginine methylation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein by PRMT6 negatively affects Tat Interactions with both cyclin T1 and the Tat transactivation region.Journal of virology · 2007Article
- Selection of TAR RNA-binding chameleon peptides by using a retroviral replication system.Journal of virology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Human immunodeficiency viruses (HIVs) and the related bovine lentiviruses bovine immunodeficiency virus (BIV) and Jembrana disease virus (JDV) utilize the viral Tat protein to activate viral transcription. The arginine-rich RNA-binding domains of the Tat proteins bind to their cognate transactivation response element (TAR) RNA hairpins located at the 5' ends of the viral mRNAs, resulting in enhanced processivity of RNA polymerase II. It has previously been shown that HIV type 1 (HIV-1) Tat requires the cellular cyclin T1 protein for high-affinity RNA binding whereas BIV Tat and JDV Tat bind with high affinity on their own and adopt distinct beta-hairpin conformations when complexed to RNA. Here we have engineered the BIV and JDV Tat-TAR interactions into HIV-1 and show that the heterologous interactions support viral replication, correlating well with their RNA-binding affinities. Viruses engineered with a variant TAR able to bind all three Tat proteins replicate efficiently with any of the proteins. In one virus containing a noncognate Tat-TAR pair that neither interacts nor efficiently replicates (HIV-1 TAR and BIV Tat), viral revertants were isolated in which TAR had become mutated to generate a functional BIV Tat binding site. Our results support the view that incremental changes to TAR structure can provide routes for evolving new Tat-TAR complexes while maintaining active viral replication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.