Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12524369›Full record

ArticleGenetics2002

BEST: a novel computational approach for comparing gene expression patterns from early stages of Drosophila melanogaster development.

Sudhir Kumar, Karthik Jayaraman, Sethuraman Panchanathan, Rajalakshmi Gurunathan, Ana Marti-Subirana, Stuart J Newfeld

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sparse Methods for Biomedical Data.SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of embryonic expression within multigene families using the FlyExpress discovery platform reveals more spatial than temporal divergence.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sudhir KumarCenter for Evolutionary Functional Genomics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA. s.kumar@asu.edu
Karthik Jayaraman
Sethuraman Panchanathan
Rajalakshmi Gurunathan
Ana Marti-Subirana
Stuart J Newfeld
Arizona State University · USPhoenix College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic gene expression patterns are an indispensable part of modern developmental biology. Currently, investigators must visually inspect numerous images containing embryonic expression patterns to identify spatially similar patterns for inferring potential genetic interactions. The lack of a computational approach to identify pattern similarities is an impediment to advancement in developmental biology research because of the rapidly increasing amount of available embryonic gene expression data. Therefore, we have developed computational approaches to automate the comparison of gene expression patterns contained in images of early stage Drosophila melanogaster embryos (prior to the beginning of germ-band elongation); similarities and differences in gene expression patterns in these early stages have extensive developmental effects. Here we describe a basic expression search tool (BEST) to retrieve best matching expression patterns for a given query expression pattern and a computational device for gene interaction inference using gene expression pattern images and information on the associated genotypes and probes. Analysis of a prototype collection of Drosophila gene expression pattern images is presented to demonstrate the utility of these methods in identifying biologically meaningful matches and inferring gene interactions by direct image content analysis. In particular, the use of BEST searches for gene expression patterns is akin to that of BLAST searches for finding similar sequences. These computational developmental biology methodologies are likely to make the great wealth of embryonic gene expression pattern data easily accessible and to accelerate the discovery of developmental networks.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsDNA, ComplementaryDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalPhenotypeRNADNA, ComplementaryRNA

Identifiers

PMID12524369
PMCPMC1462359
OpenAlexW1857352599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.