Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12524324›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2003

A closer look at the canonical 'Raft Mixture' in model membrane studies.

Sarah L Veatch, Sarah L Keller

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The KRAS and other prenylated polybasic domain membrane anchors recognize phosphatidylserine acyl chain structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Synthesis of GbAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deciphering lipid codes: K-Ras as a paradigm.Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. With or without rafts? Alternative views on cell membranes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah L Veatch
Sarah L Keller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CholesterolLipid BilayersMacromolecular SubstancesMembrane FluidityMembrane MicrodomainsMembranes, ArtificialMolecular ConformationPhosphatidylcholinesSphingomyelins1,2-oleoylphosphatidylcholineCholesterolLipid BilayersMacromolecular SubstancesMembranes, ArtificialPhosphatidylcholinesSphingomyelins

Identifiers

PMID12524324
PMCPMC1302652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.