ArticleBiophysical journal2003
Ca2+ entry-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca current: a novel formulation for cardiac action potential models.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Models of the cardiac L-type calcium current: A quantitative review.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2023Review
- A bilobal model of CaThe Journal of general physiology · 2018Article
- Rate dependence and regulation of action potential and calcium transient in a canine cardiac ventricular cell model.Circulation · 2004Article
- Ca2+ entry-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca current: a novel formulation for cardiac action potential models.Biophysical journal · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac L-type Ca current (I(Ca,L)) is controlled not only by voltage but also by Ca(2+)-dependent mechanisms. Precise implementation of I(Ca,L) in cardiac action potential models therefore requires thorough understanding of intracellular Ca(2+) dynamics, which is not yet available. Here, we present a novel formulation of I(Ca,L) for action potential models that does not explicitly require the knowledge of local intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)). In this model, whereas I(Ca,L) is obtained as the product of voltage-dependent gating parameters (d and f), Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation parameters (f(Ca): f(Ca-entry) and f(Ca-SR)), and Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz current equation as in previous studies, f(Ca) is not a instantaneous function of [Ca(2+)](i) but is determined by two terms: onset of inactivation proportional to the influx of Ca(2+) and time-dependent recovery (dissociation). We evaluated the new I(Ca,L) subsystem in the framework of the standard cardiac action potential model. The new formulation produced a similar temporal profile of I(Ca,L) as the standard, but with different gating mechanisms. Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation gradually proceeded throughout the plateau phase, replacing the voltage-dependent inactivation parameter in the LRd model. In typical computations, f declined to approximately 0.7 and f(Ca-entry) to approximately 0.1, whereas deactivation caused fading of I(Ca,L) during final repolarization. These results support experimental findings that Ca(2+) entering through I(Ca,L) is essential for inactivation. After responses to standard voltage-clamp protocols were examined, the new model was applied to analyze the behavior of I(Ca,L) when action potential was prolonged by several maneuvers. Our study provides a basis for theoretical analysis of I(Ca,L) during action potentials, including the cases encountered in long QT syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.