ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2003
Priorities for development of research methods in occupational cancer.
Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene-environment interactions in birth defect etiology: Challenges and opportunities.Current topics in developmental biology · 2023Review
- Epidemiological Research on Occupational and Environmental Carcinogens.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Agreement in Occupational Exposures Between Men and Women Using Retrospective Assessments by Expert Coders.Annals of work exposures and health · 2018Article
- Priority Setting for Occupational Cancer Prevention.Safety and health at work · 2018Article
- Current and new challenges in occupational lung diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2017Review
- Metodologías para la priorización en investigación en salud: una revisión sistemática de la literatura.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2017Article
- Two Suspected Worksite or Occupational Cancer Clusters Investigated Using the Cancer Data Registry and Multiple Primary Standardized Incidence Ratios in SEER *Stat-Idaho, 2013-2014.Journal of registry management · 2016Article
- Investing in prospective cohorts for etiologic study of occupational exposures.American journal of industrial medicine · 2015Article
- Susceptibility to DNA damage in workers occupationally exposed to pesticides, to tannery chemicals and to coal dust during mining.Genetics and molecular biology · 2012Article
- A retrospective assessment of occupational exposure to elemental carbon in the U.S. trucking industry.Environmental health perspectives · 2011Article
- Longer rodent bioassay fails to address 2-year bioassay's flaws.Environmental health perspectives · 2008Article
- Father's occupational exposure to carcinogenic agents and childhood acute leukemia: a new method to assess exposure (a case-control study).BMC cancer · 2008Article
- Environmental toxins; their impact on children's health.Archives of disease in childhood · 2004Review
- Applying new biotechnologies to the study of occupational cancer--a workshop summary.Environmental health perspectives · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Occupational cancer research methods was identified in 1996 as 1 of 21 priority research areas in the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA). To implement NORA, teams of experts from various sectors were formed and given the charge to further define research needs and develop strategies to enhance or augment research in each priority area. This article is a product of that process. Focus on occupational cancer research methods is important both because occupational factors play a significant role in a number of cancers, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, and also because occupational cohorts (because of higher exposure levels) often provide unique opportunities to evaluate health effects of environmental toxicants and understand the carcinogenic process in humans. Despite an explosion of new methods for cancer research in general, these have not been widely applied to occupational cancer research. In this article we identify needs and gaps in occupational cancer research methods in four broad areas: identification of occupational carcinogens, design of epidemiologic studies, risk assessment, and primary and secondary prevention. Progress in occupational cancer will require interdisciplinary research involving epidemiologists, industrial hygienists, toxicologists, and molecular biologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.