ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2003
Infectious Esophagitis.
Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Mucins in Esophageal Inflammatory Diseases.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Herpes simplex virus esophagitis in an immunocompromised patient: case report of an atypical presentation.Revista peruana de medicina experimental y salud publica · 2025Article
- Infective Esophagitis.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Manifestation of Herpes Esophagitis: One Single-center Experience in Taiwan.Medicine · 2016Article
- Overview of infectious esophagitis.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013Article
- Mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious esophagitis can have significant implications in an impaired host. Described most commonly in immunocompromised patients, infectious esophagitis can also occasionally be discovered in immunocompetent individuals in several unique clinical settings. Evaluation of the typical presenting complaints, such as dysphagia or odynophagia, are especially important in immunocompetent patients, and therapy should be directed at the appropriate predisposing condition and resultant infectious agent. In immunocompromised patients, however, clinical experience supports the use of empiric therapy in patients without concomitant systemic complaints. Especially in AIDS patients or those with lymphoma or leukemia, the initial approach to infectious esophagitis complaints (ie, dysphagia or odynophagia) is to begin an empiric trial of oral systemic fluconazole for presumed candidal esophagitis. If the individual remains symptomatic after 3 to 7 days or has any associated systemic complaints or concerning clinical findings (eg, hematemesis), then upper endoscopy with biopsies is indicated. If an etiologic agent other than Candida is defined by histologic, immunohistochemical, or culture methods, then appropriate therapy can be initiated. There are many important and pathologic agents implicated in infectious esophagitis. Thus, directed therapy needs to be administered appropriately and in a timely fashion to avoid poor short-term problems or long-term sequelae.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.