SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002
Short-acting beta 2 agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Meta-analysis: anticholinergics, but not beta-agonists, reduce severe exacerbations and respiratory mortality in COPD.Journal of general internal medicine · 2006Pooled it
- Systematic review of clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: beta-agonist use compared with anticholinergics and inhaled corticosteroids.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunologyPooled it
- Adherence to the GOLD Guidelines in Primary Care: Data from the Swiss COPD Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Time-Dependent Risk of Cardiovascular Events Following an Exacerbation in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Post Hoc Analysis From the IMPACT Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Triple Therapy in COPD: Can We Welcome the Reduction in Cardiovascular Risk and Mortality?Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- The Effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) as an Adjunct Treatment on Stable COPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Change in Inhaler Use, Lung Function, and Oxygenation in Association with Symptoms in COPD.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2020Article
- Sphingolipids in COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019Review
- Chronic Bronchitis: Where Are We Now?Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2019Article
- Article
- Pharmacological Management of People Living with End-Stage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Drugs & aging · 2017Article
- Inhaled treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: what's new and how does it fit?QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2016Review
- Diagnosis and pharmacotherapy of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the finnish guidelines.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2015Review
- Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: cardiovascular links.BioMed research international · 2014Review
- Guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2013Article
- [Alveolar epithelial cell injury as an etiopathogenic factor in pulmonary fibrosis].Archivos de bronconeumologia · 2012Review
- Albuterol enantiomer levels, lung function and QTc interval in patients with acute severe asthma and COPD in the emergency department.International journal of emergency medicine · 2011Article
- Determinants of polypharmacy and compliance with GOLD guidelines in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a chronic condition characterised by progressive airflow limitation that is at most partially reversible. Despite the lack of reversibility patients often report symptomatic improvement with short-acting beta-2 bronchodilator medication. Short-acting beta-2 bronchodilators are used in the management of both stable and acute exacerbations of COPD.
objectivesTo determine the clinical effectiveness and assess the adverse effects of regular treatment with short-acting beta-2 agonists bronchodilators in patients with stable COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was carried out using the Cochrane Airways Group database. In addition, the reference lists of review articles and the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved in full text were searched for other potentially relevant citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs of at least one week in duration comparing treatment with inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists with placebo in patients with stable COPD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and study quality assessment was performed independently by two reviewers. Where further or missing data was required, authors of studies were contacted. The data was analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager 4.1. MAIN
resultsThirteen studies were included in this review. All studies used a crossover design and were of high quality. Spirometry performed at the end of the study period and after the administration of treatment (post-bronchodilator) showed a slight but significant increase in FEV1 and FVC when compared to placebo (WMD=0.14 L; 95%CI=0.04,0.25 & WMD=0.30 L; 95%CI=0.02,0.58, respectively). In addition, both morning and evening PEFR were significantly better during active treatment than during placebo (WMD=29.17 L/min; 95%CI=0.25,58.09 & WMD=36.75 L/min; 95%CI=2.56,70.94, respectively). A significant improvement in daily breathlessness score was observed during treatment with beta-2 agonist when compared to placebo (SMD=1.33; 95%CI=1.0,1.65). The risk of dropping out of the study (treatment failure) when on treatment with placebo was almost twice that of patients on treatment with beta-2 agonists (RR=0.49; 95%CI=0.33,0.73). Patients preferred beta-2 agonists almost 10 times more frequently to placebo (OR=9.04; 95%CI=4.64,17.61). One study that used a validated questionnaire for 'quality of life' assessment, found highly significant improvements in the scores for dyspnoea (p=0.003) and fatigue (p=0.0003) during treatment with salbutamol. No studies reported serious side effects during treatment with inhaled beta-agonists. However, none of the studies were of sufficient length or size in order to allow any meaningful information on long-term occurrence of side effects. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsUse of short-acting beta-2 agonists on a regular basis for at least seven days in stable COPD is associated with improvements in post bronchodilator lung function and a decrease in breathlessness. Patients are far more likely to prefer treatment with beta-2 agonists than placebo, and less likely to drop out from such treatment. None of the studies included in this review reported sufficient data or were of sufficient length or size in order to provide reliable information on adverse effects. Therefore large scale, parallel, longer term studies would be needed to investigate the effect of treatment with regular inhaled beta-2 agonists on mortality, disease progression and side effects. Newer, long acting bronchodilators (including long-acting beta-2 agonists) are currently available and they may be more practical and/or effective in these patients. However, this review indicates that treatment with these older, inexpensive drugs is beneficial in patients with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.