Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12519538›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Prophylactic antibiotics for inhibiting preterm labour with intact membranes.

J King, V Flenady

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Tocolytics for preterm premature rupture of membranes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortality.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. The prevention, diagnosis and treatment of premature labor.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Antibiotics for ureaplasma in the vagina in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  8. Preterm birth.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J KingDepartment of Perinatal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Carlton, Victoria, Australia, 3053. jfking@unimelb.edu.au
V Flenady

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe contribution of subclinical genital tract infection to the aetiology of preterm birth is gaining increasing recognition, but the role of prophylactic antibiotic treatment in the management of preterm labour is uncertain. Since rupture of the membranes is an important factor in the progression of preterm labour, it is important to see if the routine administration of antibiotics confers any benefit, prior to membrane rupture.

objectivesTo assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotics administered to women in preterm labour with intact membranes, on maternal and neonatal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's specialised register of controlled trials (May 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2002), MEDLINE (1965 to May 2002). Other sources included contacting recognised experts and cross referencing relevant material. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials which compared antibiotic treatment with placebo or no treatment for women in preterm labour (between 20 and 36 weeks' gestation) with intact membranes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group were used. Evaluation of methodological quality and trial data extraction were undertaken independently by the authors. Results are presented using relative risk for categorical data and weighted mean difference for continuous data. MAIN

resultsThis review has been updated (2002) to include data from the 'ORACLE II 2001' trial (six times larger than the previous 10 trials combined), which now dominates the results of this review. Meta-analysis of the 11 included trials (7428 women enrolled) shows a reduction in maternal infection with the use of prophylactic antibiotics (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.87) but fails to demonstrate a benefit or harm for any of the prespecified neonatal outcomes. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThis review fails to demonstrate a clear overall benefit from prophylactic antibiotic treatment for preterm labour with intact membranes on neonatal outcomes and raises concerns about increased neonatal mortality for those who received antibiotics. This treatment cannot therefore be currently recommended for routine practice. Further research may be justified (when sensitive markers for subclinical infection become available) in order to determine if there is a subgroup of women who could experience benefit from antibiotic treatment for preterm labour prior to membrane rupture, and to identify which antibiotic or combination of antibiotics is most effective.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisFemaleHumansObstetric Labor, PrematurePregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.