Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12519536›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Haemodilution for acute ischaemic stroke.

K Asplund

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Recommendations for the use of albumin and immunoglobulins.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2009
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Predictors of stroke outcome: the role of hemorheology, natural anticoagulants, and serum albumin.The Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Hemodilution.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Potential role of PMD-TCD monitoring in the management of hemodynamically unstable intracranial stenosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2012
    Article
  16. Red blood cell transfusion in the neurological ICU.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K AsplundDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden, Umeå, Sweden, SE-901 85. Kjell.Asplund@medicin.umu.se

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIschaemic stroke interrupts the flow of blood to part of the brain. Haemodilution is thought to improve the flow of blood to the affected areas of the brain and thus reduce infarct size.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of haemodilution in acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched January 2002), Medline (1966-June 2002) and conference abstracts. We contacted manufacturers and investigators in the field to identify any additional published and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of haemodilution treatment in people with acute ischaemic stroke. Only trials in which treatment was started within 72 hours of stroke onset were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers assessed trial quality and independently extracted the data. MAIN

resultsEighteen trials were included. A combination of venesection and plasma volume expander was used in eight trials. Ten trials used plasma volume expander alone. The plasma volume expander was dextran 40 in 12 trials, hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in five trials and albumin in one trial. Two trials tested haemodilution in combination with another therapy. Evaluation was blinded in 11 trials. Five trials probably included some patients with intracerebral haemorrhage. Haemodilution did not significantly reduce deaths within the first four weeks (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.38). Similarly, haemodilution did not influence deaths within three to six months (odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.22), or death and dependency or institutionalisation (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.15). The results were similar in confounded and unconfounded trials, and in trials of isovolaemic and hypervolaemic haemodilution. No statistically significant benefits were documented for any particular type of haemodiluting agents, but the statistical power to detect effects of HES and albumin was weak. Six trials reported venous thromboembolic events. There was a tendency towards reduction in deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism at three to six months follow-up (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 1.06). There was no increased risk of serious cardiac events among haemodiluted patients. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe overall results of this review are compatible both with modest benefit and moderate harm of haemodilution therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. This therapy has not been proven to improve survival or functional outcome.

Indexed as

HemodilutionBrain IschemiaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.