Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12519397›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2003

Lymphocyte and mast cell counts are increased in the nasal mucosa in symptomatic natural colds.

O-P Alho, T J Karttunen, R Karttunen, H Tuokko, M Koskela, M Uhari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Viral infections and susceptibility to recurrent sinusitis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2005
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

O-P AlhoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oulu and the Microbiology Laboratory of Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland. opalho@cc.oulu.fi
T J Karttunen
R Karttunen
H Tuokko
M Koskela
M Uhari

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the virus-induced immune response is important in understanding the pathophysiology of respiratory virus infections. Data on the cellular immune response is still limited and based mainly on experimental studies. Natural colds may differ in their pathophysiology from experimentally induced ones. To evaluate the inflammatory cell responses in the upper respiratory tract during natural colds we counted the number of lymphocytes, mast cells and macrophages in the nasal mucosa. Nasal biopsies were taken from 22 adult volunteers during the acute (2-4 days of symptoms) and convalescent phases (day 21) of the cold, and the numbers of cells were counted with immunohistochemical methods. Viral aetiology was identified in 14 (64%) subjects by using viral isolation, antigen detection and rhino-polymerase chain reaction assays. The number of T lymphocytes was increased in the nasal epithelium and that of T and B lymphocytes and mast cells in the subepithelial layer in the acute phase compared to the convalescent phase. Intraepithelial T lymphocyte counts were significantly higher in the subjects who had a proven viral infection or a finding of pathogenic bacteria in the nasopharynx compared to the subjects without such findings (P = 0.005 and P = 0.04, respectively). Contrary to the earlier experimental studies, we found that viruses cause accumulation of T and B lymphocytes and mast cells during the first days of a symptomatic naturally acquired respiratory infection.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultB-LymphocytesCell CountCommon ColdCommunity-Acquired InfectionsHumansLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMacrophagesMast CellsNasal MucosaStatistics, NonparametricT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID12519397
PMCPMC1808600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.