ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003
Evaluation of a method for identification of Candida dubliniensis bloodstream isolates.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Biology, Virulence, and General Aspects ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024Review
- Candida dubliniensis: an appraisal of its clinical significance as a bloodstream pathogen.PloS one · 2012Article
- Prevalence of Candida dubliniensis fungemia in Argentina: identification by a novel multiplex PCR and comparison of different phenotypic methods.Mycopathologia · 2011Article
- Candida dubliniensis: epidemiology and phenotypic methods for identification.Mycopathologia · 2010Review
- Isolation of Candida dubliniensis for the first time in Cali, Colombia, and its identification with phenotyping methods.Mycopathologia · 2009Article
- Use of a commercial reagent leads to reduced germ tube production by Candida dubliniensis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
- Tobacco agar, a new medium for differentiating Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2004Article
- Discrimination between Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis isolated from HIV-positive patients by using commercial method in comparison with PCR assay.Folia microbiologica · 2004Article
- Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate methods for differentiating Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis, 772 putative C. albicans bloodstream isolates were tested for growth at 37 and 42 degrees C. Isolates showing no growth at 42 degrees C, abundant chlamydospore production, and the sugar assimilation pattern of the type strain were confirmed by DNA-based procedures to be C. dubliniensis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.