Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12517880›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Evaluation of broth microdilution testing parameters and agar diffusion Etest procedure for testing susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. to caspofungin acetate (MK-0991).

Ana Espinel-Ingroff

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mycetoma due toIDCases · 2022
    Article
  4. A 9-Year Experience ofInfection and drug resistance · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ana Espinel-IngroffMedical College of Virginia Campus, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA. avingrof@hsc.vcu.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NCCLS M38-A document does not describe guidelines for testing caspofungin acetate (MK-0991) and other echinocandins against molds. This study evaluated the susceptibilities of 200 isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus, A. flavus, A. nidulans, A. niger, and A. terreus to caspofungin (MICs and minimum effective concentrations [MECs]) by using standard RPMI 1640 (RPMI) and antibiotic medium 3 (M3), two inoculum sizes (10(3) and 10(4) CFU/ml), and two MIC determination criteria (complete [MICs-0] and prominent growth inhibition [MICs-2]) at 24 and 48 h. Etest MICs were also determined. In general, caspofungin MIC-2 and MEC pairs were comparable with both media and inocula (geometric mean ranges of MECs and MICs, respectively, with larger inoculum: 0.12 to 0.64 microg/ml and 0.12 to 0.44 microg/ml with RPMI versus 0.04 to 0.51 microg/ml and 0.03 to 0.21 microg/ml with M3); however, MEC results were less influenced by testing conditions than MICs, especially with the larger inoculum. Overall, the agreement between caspofungin Etest MICs and broth dilution values was higher with MECs obtained with M3 (>90%) and the large inoculum than under the other testing conditions. Because RPMI is a more stable and chemically defined medium than M3, the determination at 24 h of the easier visual MECs with RPMI and the inoculum recommended in the M38-A document appears to be a suitable procedure at present for in vitro testing of caspofungin against Aspergillus spp. Future in vitro correlations with in vivo outcome of both microdilution and Etest procedures may detect more-relevant testing conditions.

Indexed as

PeptidesPeptides, CyclicAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAspergillusCaspofunginCell DivisionCulture MediaEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginCulture MediaEchinocandinsLipopeptidesPeptidesPeptides, Cyclic

Identifiers

PMID12517880
PMCPMC149640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.