ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003
Multicenter evaluation of the performance characteristics of the NucliSens HIV-1 QT assay used for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current and Future Perspectives on Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Technologies for Diagnosing Infections.Infection and drug resistance · 2020Review
- Theoretical design and analysis of multivolume digital assays with wide dynamic range validated experimentally with microfluidic digital PCR.Analytical chemistry · 2011Article
- Performance of three commercial viral load assays, Versant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2, testing HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinant variants.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
- Comparison of the real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (RTi-NASBA) with conventional NASBA, and galactomannan assay for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2007Article
- Real-time NASBA detection of SARS-associated coronavirus and comparison with real-time reverse transcription-PCR.Journal of medical virology · 2005Article
- Life beyond PCR: alternative target amplification technologies for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, part I.Clinical microbiology newsletter · 2004Article
- Advances in developing HIV-1 viral load assays for resource-limited settings.Biotechnology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analytical performance of the NucliSens HIV-1 QT assay, a highly sensitive test based on nucleic acid sequence-based amplification technology, was evaluated in a multicenter trial. Assay specificity was evaluated with 502 plasma (EDTA) specimens from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-seronegative volunteer donors. No HIV-1 RNA was reported in any of the donor specimens. Analytical sensitivity and reproducibility were estimated with panels prepared from a high-titer well-characterized HIV-1 RNA stock (5.84 x 10(8) RNA copies/ml). The assay's dynamic range was linear from 10(6) to 10(1) HIV-1 RNA copies, with a lower detectable limit of 25 copies/ml and a 95% detection rate of 176 copies/ml. Sensitivity of the assay to detect HIV-1 RNA in clinical specimens from patients (n = 101) and in commercially available or prepared panels (n = 24) was compared with NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT (an earlier version of NucliSens HIV-1 QT) and with the Food and Drug Administration-approved standard and ultrasensitive AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR, version 1.0, assays. Detection of HIV-1 RNA was reproducible over a 5-log range (mean standard deviation = 0.15 log). The NucliSens and the standard AMPLICOR assays were equivalent in detection of HIV-1 RNA (concentration, 10(3) to 10(5) copies/ml) in 57 clinical specimens. The NucliSens assay was more sensitive in detecting HIV-1 RNA at lower concentrations (</=10(2) copies/ml) (44 of 44) than either the standard AMPLICOR test (12 of 19) or the NASBA assay (10 of 25). A 25% increase in HIV-1 RNA detection frequency with panels was observed with the NucliSens assay (23 of 24) compared with the standard AMPLICOR test (17 of 24). The new assay was highly specific and demonstrated good sensitivity with a broad linear dynamic range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.