Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12516864›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology2002

Protein-protein interactions required during translation.

Daniel R Gallie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Putative Interaction Proteins of the Ubiquitin Ligase Hrd1 inEvolutionary bioinformatics online · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Non-canonical Translation in Plant RNA Viruses.Frontiers in plant science · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel R GallieDepartment of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0129, USA. drgallie@citrus.ucr.edu
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein synthesis requires the involvement of numerous accessory factors that assist the ribosome in translation initiation, elongation, and termination. Extensive protein-protein and protein-RNA interactions are required to bring together the accessory factors, tRNAs, ribosomes, and mRNA into a productive complex and these interactions undergo dynamic alterations during each step of the translation initiation process. Initiation represents the most complex aspect of translation, requiring more accessory proteins, called initiation factors, than either elongation or termination. Not surprisingly, initiation is most often the rate-limiting step of translation and, as such, most (but not all) examples of translational regulation involve the regulation of protein-protein or protein-RNA interactions of the initiation complex. In this review, we focus on those interactions required for efficient translation initiation and how such interactions are regulated by developmental or environmental signals.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsEukaryotic Initiation FactorsHumansModels, BiologicalPlantsProtein BindingProtein BiosynthesisRibosomal ProteinsRibosomesRNARNA, MessengerRNA, RibosomalRNA, TransferSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Homology, Amino AcidEukaryotic Initiation FactorsRibosomal ProteinsRNARNA, MessengerRNA, RibosomalRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID12516864
OpenAlexW2173689381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.