Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12516856›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2002

Physical methods.

Alessandro Vitale

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alessandro VitaleIstituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, via Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy. vitale@ibv.mi.cnr.it

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the advent of high-output, recombinant DNA-based screening strategies, many important protein-protein interactions in the plant cell have been and still are revealed using co-sedimentation, affinity chromatography and other affinity techniques, co-immunoprecipitation and cross-linking. The advantages of these techniques, the care that should be taken interpreting the data obtained and the possible ways to overcome pitfalls are illustrated.

Indexed as

Centrifugation, Density GradientChromatography, AffinityChromatography, GelCross-Linking ReagentsPlant ProteinsPlantsPrecipitin TestsProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingRecombinant Fusion ProteinsCross-Linking ReagentsPlant ProteinsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.