ReviewDrugs & aging2003
Differential pharmacokinetics of theophylline in elderly patients.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacotherapies in Older Adults with COPD: Challenges and Opportunities.Drugs & aging · 2023Review
- Coffee Drinking and Adverse Physical Outcomes in the Aging Adult Population: A Systematic Review.Metabolites · 2022Review
- Emerging Roles of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors in the Altered Clearance of Drugs during Chronic Kidney Disease.Toxins · 2019Review
- Characterization and redox mechanism of asthma in the elderly.Oncotarget · 2016Review
- Article
- Predicting pharmacokinetics of drugs using physiologically based modeling--application to food effects.The AAPS journal · 2009Review
- A composite screening tool for medication reviews of outpatients: general issues with specific examples.Drugs & aging · 2007Review
- Management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly : an appraisal of published evidence.Drugs & aging · 2007Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical use of theophylline as a first-line bronchodilator has declined during the last two decades. However, in many clinical settings, such as an emergency bronchial asthma attack, theophylline may have a first-line role, in combination with beta(2)-adrenoreceptor agonists and corticosteroids, for improving the asthmatic status. Furthermore, many therapeutic mechanisms of theophylline for bronchial asthma have been reported, and recent studies have suggested that theophylline therapy may have a beneficial role in the management of chronic stable asthma as well as exacerbated disease. However, theophylline has a low therapeutic index because the bronchodilation it produces has a linear relationship with logarithmic increases in serum concentration for the therapeutic range of 5-20 mg/L. Thus, the knowledge of its basic pharmacokinetics and the factors that can alter its clearance is clinically relevant for physicians. Especially when used in elderly asthmatic patients, dosage adjustment of theophylline is a requisite since the elderly have several risk factors that may increase the plasma theophylline level, such as reduced clearance, various underlying diseases and multiple coadministered drugs. After theophylline treatment has been initiated, therapeutic drug monitoring is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.