Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12512857›Full record

ReviewIUBMB life2002

Keratan sulfate biosynthesis.

James L Funderburgh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IUBMB life, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. AMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James L FunderburghUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Ophthalmology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. jlfunder@pitt.edu
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

PROTEOGLYCANS IN NORMAL AND SCARRED CORNEASR01EY009368 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FUNDERBURGH, JAMES L · 1993 to 2012
$3.8M
NEI NIH HHS EY09368NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratan sulfate was originally identified as the major glycosaminoglycan of cornea but is now known to modify at least a dozen different proteins in a wide variety of tissues. Despite a large body of research documenting keratan sulfate structure, and an increasing interest in the biological functions of keratan sulfate, until recently little was known of the specific enzymes involved in keratan sulfate biosynthesis or of the molecular mechanisms that control keratan sulfate expression. In the last 2 years, however, marked progress has been achieved in identification of genes involved in keratan sulfate biosynthesis and in development of experimental conditions to study keratan sulfate secretion and control in vitro. This review summarizes current understanding of keratan sulfate structure and recent developments in understanding keratan sulfate biosynthesis.

Indexed as

Carbohydrate SequenceKeratan SulfateKeratan Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID12512857
PMCPMC2874674
OpenAlexW2100934181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.