Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12509596›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2003

US birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality: 1995-1997 rates for whites, hispanics, and blacks.

Greg R Alexander, Michael Kogan, Deren Bader, Wally Carlo, Marilee Allen, Joanne Mor

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03979196 (Inpatient vs Outpatient Management of Women With Short Cervix), which is not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03979196 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Inpatient vs Outpatient Management of Women With Short Cervix: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2019 to 2021Enrolled5ConditionsPreterm Birth, Pregnancy, High RiskArmsInpatient Management, Outpatient Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Greg R AlexanderDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0022, USA. alexandg@uab.edu
Michael Kogan
Deren Bader
Wally Carlo
Marilee Allen
Joanne Mor

Funding

WILLINGNESS OF PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS TO ADOPT HANDHELD COMPUTINGP20RR011091 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI WRIGHT, CLAIRE · 1995 to 2009
$16.5M
ROLE OF PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN GESTATIONAL DIABETESU54RR014607 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI WRIGHT, TRICIA E · 1999 to 2008
$15.5M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR011091NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR011091-11NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR11091NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR014607-05PHS HHS MC00008-16 S21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn recent years, gains in neonatal survival have been most evident among very low birth weight, preterm, and low birth weight (LBW) infants. Most of the improvement in neonatal survival since the early 1980s seems to be the consequence of decreasing birth weight-specific mortality rates, which occurred during a period of increasing preterm and LBW rates. Although the decline in neonatal mortality has been widely publicized in the United States, research suggests that clinicians may still underestimate the chances of survival of an infant who is born too early or too small and may overestimate the eventuality of serious disability. So that clinicians may have current and needed ethnic- and race-specific estimates of the "chances" of early survival for newborn infants, we examined birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality rates for the 3 largest ethnic/racial groups in the United States: non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic blacks. Marked racial variation in birth weight and gestational age-specific mortality has long been recognized, and growing concerns have been raised about ongoing and increasing racial disparities in pregnancy outcomes. Our purpose for this investigation was to provide an up-to-date national reference for birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality rates for use by clinicians in care decision making and discussions with parents.

methodsThe National Center for Health Statistics linked live birth-infant death cohort files for 1995-1997 were used for this study. Singleton live births to US resident mothers with a reported maternal ethnicity/race of non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, or Hispanic (n = 10 610 715) were selected for analysis. Birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality rates were calculated using 250 g/2-week intervals for each ethnic/racial group.

resultsThe overall neonatal mortality rates for whites, Hispanics, and blacks were 3.24, 3.45, and 8.16 neonatal deaths per 1000 live births, and the proportion of births <28 weeks was 0.35%, 0.45%, and 1.39%, respectively. Newborns who weighed <1500 g comprised <2.5% of all births in each racial/ethnic group but accounted for >50% of neonatal deaths. For whites, Hispanics, and blacks, >50% of newborns 24 to 25 weeks of gestational age survived. For most combinations of birth weights <3500 g and gestational ages of <37 weeks, the neonatal mortality rate was lowest among blacks, compared with whites or Hispanics. At these same gestational age/birth weight combinations, Hispanics have slightly lower mortality rates than whites. For combinations of birth weights >3500 g and gestational ages of 37 to 41 weeks, Hispanics had the lowest neonatal mortality rate. In these birth weight/gestational age combinations, where approximately two thirds of births occur, blacks had the highest neonatal mortality rate.

conclusionsCompared with earlier reports, these data suggest that a substantial improvement in birth weight/gestational age-specific neonatal mortality has occurred in the United States. Regardless of ethnicity/race, the risk of a neonatal death does not exceed 50% (the suggested definition for the limit of viability), except for birth weights below 500 g and gestational ages <24 weeks. Notwithstanding, ethnic/racial variations in neonatal mortality rates continue to persist, both in overall rates and within birth weight/gestational age categories. Blacks continue to have higher proportions for preterm and LBW births, compared with either whites or Hispanics. At the same time, blacks experience lower risks of neonatal mortality for preterm and LBW infants, while having higher risks of mortality among term, postterm, normal birth weight, and macrosomic births.

Indexed as

Black PeopleWhite PeopleBlack or African AmericanCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHispanic or LatinoHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID12509596
PMCPMC1382183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.