Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12509332›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2003

Enhancing the anaerobic response.

Rudy Dolferus, Erik Jan Klok, Christian Delessert, Sarah Wilson, Kathleen P Ismond, Allen G Good, W James Peacock, Elizabeth S Dennis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Low oxygen response mechanisms in green organisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rudy DolferusCSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. rudy.dolferus@csiro.au
Erik Jan Klok
Christian Delessert
Sarah Wilson
Kathleen P Ismond
Allen G Good
W James Peacock
Elizabeth S Dennis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteome analysis, and more recently DNA chip technology, has led to the identification of a large number of genes that are implicated in the anaerobic response of plants. As a result, an increasingly complex picture of the response in terms of biochemical and regulatory processes is emerging. A challenge is to find out more about the function of these newly identified gene products, and how they contribute to flooding tolerance. Our approach has been to manipulate levels of candidate gene products (using sense and antisense constructs) in the model system Arabidopsis thaliana, combined with biochemical and phenotypic analysis of the resulting transgenic plants.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnaerobiosisArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsFermentationGenes, PlantOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisTrans-ActivatorsWaterArabidopsis ProteinsMYB2 protein, ArabidopsisTrans-ActivatorsWater

Identifiers

PMID12509332
PMCPMC4244982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.