Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12508705›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2002

From physician to consumer: the effectiveness of strategies to manage health care utilization.

Kathryn E Flynn, Maureen A Smith, Margaret K Davis

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of medication cost transparency alerts on prescriber behavior.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. GENETIC DUTIES.William and Mary law review · 2020
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contemporary quality of life issues affecting gynecologic cancer survivors.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2012
    Review
  8. Article
  9. [Scientific evidence and the cost of innovations in the health-care system].Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983) · 2009
    Article
  10. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model.Quality & safety in health care · 2006
    Review
  11. Overprescribing of lipid lowering agents.Quality & safety in health care · 2006
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn E FlynnUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Maureen A Smith
Margaret K Davis
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Minnesota System · US

Funding

Older Adults and Specialty Care Use in Managed CareR01AG019747 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI SMITH, MAUREEN A · 2001 to 2002
$562k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG019747NIA NIH HHS R01-AG-19747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many strategies are commonly used to influence physician behavior in managed care organizations. This review examines the effectiveness of three mechanisms to influence physician behavior: financial incentives directed at providers or patients, policies/procedures for managing care, and the selection/education of both providers and patients. The authors reach three conclusions. First, all health care systems use financial incentives, but these mechanisms are shifting away from financial incentives directed at the physician to those directed at the consumer. Second, heavily procedural strategies such as utilization review and gatekeeping show some evidence of effectiveness but are highly unpopular due to their restrictions on physician and patient choice. Third, a future system built on consumer choice is contradicted by mechanisms that rely solely on narrow networks of providers or the education of physicians. If patients become the new locus of decision making in health care, provider-focused mechanisms to influence physician behavior will not disappear but are likely to decline in importance.

Indexed as

GatekeepingPhysician Incentive PlansUtilization ReviewCase ManagementConsumer BehaviorCost SharingDecision MakingDrug Utilization ReviewFeedbackHealth Services ResearchHumansInsurance Selection BiasManaged Care ProgramsOrganizational PolicyPractice Guidelines as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID12508705
PMCPMC1635490
OpenAlexW2115198014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.