ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2002
Modulating effect of respiration on atrioventricular conduction time assessed using PR interval variation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is the variation of heart rate (or RR interval) in phase with respiration and has been extensively studied. However, the effect of respiration on atrioventricular conduction delay (and hence PR interval length) has not yet received much attention. This work reports on measurements of respiration and associated RR and PR variability, in 11 subjects, assessed through surface electrocardiogram measurements, for both paced and spontaneous respiration in the supine position. A wavelet-based approach was used to extract RR and PR intervals. The accuracy of RR and PR interval measurement was consistent with previously published work. Respiratory atrioventricular conduction delay variability (RCV) was assessed using three techniques: spectral, peak-to-trough and cosinor methods. All measures showed statistically significant variations in PR interval due to respiration during paced respiration at 6 min(-1). Of the three measures, cosinor analysis was most reliable in highlighting RCV. Using this measure, statistically significant RCV was seen in ten out of the 11 subjects during paced respiration. The magnitude of the variability was estimated as +/- 5.9% of the mean PR interval. In spontaneous respiration, statistically significant RCV was seen in approximately half of the subjects, with an estimated variability of +/- 1.5%. As a control, statistically significant values for RSA were also obtained from the same data, which agreed with previously published measurements. It was concluded that respiration does indeed modulate atrioventricular conduction delay, deep breathing in the supine position accentuates this effect, and cosinor analysis provides a reliable means for quantifying this effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.