Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12499177›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003

In vitro drug interaction modeling of combinations of azoles with terbinafine against clinical Scedosporium prolificans isolates.

Joseph Meletiadis, Johan W Mouton, Jacques F G M Meis, Paul E Verweij

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Establishment of epidemiological cutoff values againstJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aspirin Combined with Antifungal Drugs SuppressesJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Dematiaceous Molds.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Non-European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical utility of antifungal susceptibility testing.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph MeletiadisDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johan W Mouton
Jacques F G M Meis
Paul E Verweij
Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vitro interaction between terbinafine and the azoles voriconazole, miconazole, and itraconazole against five clinical Scedosporium prolificans isolates after 48 and 72 h of incubation was tested by a microdilution checkerboard (eight-by-twelve) technique. The antifungal effects of the drugs alone and in combination on the fungal biomass as well as on the metabolic activity of fungi were measured using a spectrophotometric method and two colorimetric methods, based on the lowest drug concentrations showed 75 and 50% growth inhibition (MIC-1 and MIC-2, respectively). The nature and the intensity of the interactions were assessed using a nonparametric approach (fractional inhibitory concentration [FIC] index model) and a fully parametric response surface approach (Greco model) of the Loewe additivity (LA) no-interaction theory as well as a nonparametric (Prichard model) and a semiparametric response surface approaches of the Bliss independence (BI) no-interaction theory. Statistically significant synergy was found between each of the three azoles and terbinafine in all cases, although with different intensities. A 27- to 64-fold and 16- to 90-fold reduction of the geometric mean of the azole and terbinafine MICs, respectively, was observed when they were combined, resulting in FIC indices of <1 to 0.02. Using the MIC-1 higher levels of synergy were obtained, which were more consistent between the two incubation periods than using the MIC-2. The strongest synergy among the azoles was found with miconazole using the BI-based models and with voriconazole using the LA-based models. The synergistic effects both on fungal growth and metabolic activity were more potent after 72 h of incubation. Fully parametric approaches in combination with the modified colorimetric method might prove useful for testing the in vitro interaction of antifungal drugs against filamentous fungi.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDrug InteractionsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNaphthalenesPyrimidinesScedosporiumTerbinafineTriazolesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsNaphthalenesPyrimidinesTerbinafineTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID12499177
PMCPMC149034
OpenAlexW2170477120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.