Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12498661›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2002

Cross-sectional study on influenza vaccination, Germany, 1999-2000.

Sybille Rehmet, Andrea Ammon, Günter Pfaff, Nikolaus Bocter, Lyle R Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Communism's Lasting Effect? Former Communist States and COVID-19 Vaccinations.Cross-cultural research : official journal of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Spectrum of tuberculous diseases in a pulmonary outpatient clinic].Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983) · 2008
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Influenza vaccination in Austria, 1982-2003.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2007
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sybille RehmetRobert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Germany. sybille.rehmet@gtz.de
Andrea Ammon
Günter Pfaff
Nikolaus Bocter
Lyle R Petersen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess influenza vaccination coverage in Germany, we conducted a nationwide telephone survey in November 1999 in adults (>18 yrs) using random-digit dialing. Overall, 23% of 1,190 survey participants reported having been vaccinated (adjusted 18%) with 16% (adjusted 15%) in former West Germany versus 35% (adjusted 32%) in former East Germany. Immunization rates for vaccination target groups were lower in West Germany (21%) than in East Germany (40%). Seven percent of health-care workers were immunized. Previous influenza vaccination, positive attitudes towards immunization, and having a family physician increased the rate of vaccination; fear of adverse effects lowered the rate. Family physicians performed 93% of the vaccinations, which suggests their key role in improving low vaccination coverage in Germany. The fact that >71% (850/1,190) of participants belonged to at least one of the vaccination target groups recommended by the German Standing Commission on Immunization emphasizes the need to focus the definition of target groups.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdultCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionGermany, EastGermany, WestHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMiddle AgedVaccinationInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID12498661
PMCPMC2738508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.