Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2002
Diminished efficacy of colonic adaptation to lactulose occurs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission.
Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of lactose digestion, its impact on intolerance and nutritional effects of dairy food restriction in inflammatory bowel diseases.Nutrition journal · 2016Pooled it
- Effect of oral lactulose on clinical and immunohistochemical parameters in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot study.BMC gastroenterology · 2007Trial
- Regulation of the intestinal microbiota: An emerging therapeutic strategy for inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Mechanisms of Action of Prebiotics and Their Effects on Gastro-Intestinal Disorders in Adults.Nutrients · 2020Review
- Review
- Carbohydrate Elimination or Adaptation Diet for Symptoms of Intestinal Discomfort in IBD: Rationales for "Gibsons' Conundrum".International journal of inflammation · 2012Article
- Protective effect of lactulose on dextran sulfate sodium-induced colonic inflammation in rats.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lactulose has been proposed to be beneficial in treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The hypothesis is based on the prebiotic potential of lactulose. A practical approach to testing its usefulness is to determine colonic adaptation to tolerable doses in patients with IBD. Our objective was to determine if a 3-week course of lactulose will decrease BH2 and symptoms in response to an acute lactulose challenge test in control subjects and IBD patients. The design was a prospective cohort study. Subjects were given a 30-g lactulose challenge test (test 1), and then ingested 10 g of lactulose twice a day for 3 weeks before being retested (Test 2). A third test was given after a further 5-week washout period. The main outcomes were the change in 4-hr sum of BH2 (sum(4HrBH2)) values obtained every 30 min, peak BH2, and 4-hr sum of symptom score (sum(4HrSS)) during the lactulose challenge test. In addition, we also report the change in self-reported symptoms and diarrhea during the 3-week administration of lactulose. In controls, sum(4HrBH2) decreased from test 1 (380.5 +/- 56.6 ppm) to test 2 (288.6 +/- 57.4 ppm) (P < 0.05), and returned toward test 1 levels by test 3 (307.5 +/- 53.1, P > 0.5). Unlike controls, the sum(4HrBH2) in patients failed to achieve significance between test 1 (444.5 +/- 55.8 ppm), test 2 (366.5 +/- 80.7 ppm, P > 0.2) or test 3 (411.6 +/- 62.5 ppm, P > 0.2). Sum(4HrSS) results in controls followed a pattern similar to sum(4HrBH2), achieving significance only in test 2 (P < 0.02). Symptoms during the intertest periods decreased by the third week in controls (P < 0.05), but not in patients (P > 0.5). Symptoms were lower in patients and varied insignificantly both in challenges and intertest periods. In conclusion, although controls adapt to a 3-week period of lactulose ingestion, IBD patients fail to meet the criteria for adaptation. However, longer studies may be needed to establish whether IBD patients are slower to adapt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.