Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12496111›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2002

Sequence-dependent dynamics of duplex DNA: the applicability of a dinucleotide model.

T M Okonogi, S C Alley, A W Reese, P B Hopkins, B H Robinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Core Promoter Regions of Antisense and Long Intergenic Non-Coding RNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Deciphering the mechanical code of the genome and epigenome.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. σJournal of bacteriology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sequence dependence of DNA bending rigidity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T M OkonogiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1700, USA.
S C Alley
A W Reese
P B Hopkins
B H Robinson
University of Washington · US

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ALI SHOJAIE · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Site Directed Spin Labeling of Interfacial Membrane ProtR01GM065944 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ROBINSON, BRUCE H · 2002 to 2005
$1.1M
SOLUTION STRUCTURE OF DNA BINDING PROTEINSP01GM032681 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REID, BRIAN R · 1985 to 1998
–
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES 07033NIGMS NIH HHS GM 32681NIGMS NIH HHS GM 55963NIGMS NIH HHS GM 65944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The short-time (submicrosecond) bending dynamics of duplex DNA were measured to determine the effect of sequence on dynamics. All measurements were obtained from a single site on duplex DNA, using a single, site-specific modified base containing a rigidly tethered, electron paramagnetic resonance active spin probe. The observed dynamics are interpreted in terms of single-step sequence-dependent bending force constants, determined from the mean squared amplitude of bending relative to the end-to-end vector using the modified weakly bending rod model. The bending dynamics at a single site are a function of the sequence of the nucleotides constituting the duplex DNA. We developed and examined several dinucleotide-based models for flexibility. The models indicate that the dominant feature of the dynamics is best explained in terms of purine- and pyrimidine-type steps, although distinction is made among all 10 unique steps: It was found that purine-purine steps (which are the same as pyrimidine-pyrimidine steps) were near average in flexibility, but the pyrimidine-purine steps (5' to 3') were nearly twice as flexible, whereas purine-pyrimidine steps were more than half as flexible as average DNA. Therefore, the range of stepwise flexibility is approximately fourfold and is characterized by both the type of base pair step (pyrimidine/purine combination) and the identity of the bases within the pair (G, A, T, or C). All of the four models considered here underscore the complexity of the dependence of dynamics on DNA sequence with certain sequences not satisfactorily explainable in terms of any dinucleotide model. These findings provide a quantitative basis for interpreting the dynamics and kinetics of DNA-sequence-dependent biological processes, including protein recognition and chromatin packaging.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidAnimalsBase SequenceDNADrosophila melanogasterElasticityElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyMolecular Sequence DataMolecular StructureMotionMutagenesis, Site-DirectedReference ValuesSequence Analysis, DNADNA

Identifiers

PMID12496111
PMCPMC1302419
OpenAlexW1978564348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.